PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Clinical Insights in Eyecare0 citations

Case Report: Interstitial Keratitis in a Patient With Past History of Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Post-LASIK Keratectasia and Scleral Lens Wear

View Full Paper
BCBen ConnellRLRichard LindsayJCJessica T Chi

Key Points

  • To describe a case of interstitial keratitis in a patient with a history of corneal collagen cross-linking and scleral lens wear.
  • Case report of a 48-year-old female patient.
  • Slit-lamp examination and histopathological analysis performed.
  • Observation of changes in corneal deposits with scleral lens use.
  • Histopathology showed interstitial keratitis with lymphocytes and macrophages.
  • Deposits in the cornea reappeared after resuming scleral lens wear.
  • Vision improved after penetrating keratoplasty with clear cornea at follow-up.

Abstract

Introduction A 48-year-old female patient wearing scleral contact lenses presented with a 4-month history of blurred left vision 13 years after collagen cross-linking (CXL) for post-LASIK keratectasia. Slit-lamp examination demonstrated multiple midstromal fine refractile deposits in the nasal and temporal paracentral left cornea, without stromal inflammation, epithelial defect, or anterior chamber reaction. A penetrating keratoplasty was performed to improve vision, which remained clear at 5 months’ follow-up. Case Report Histopathology of the corneal donor button demonstrated interstitial keratitis: A stromal infiltrate of lymphocytes, scattered foamy macrophages, and activated keratocytes. There were no crystals. Two prior corneal biopsies for microbial and histological assessments were unremarkable. Blood test results for systemic conditions associated with interstitial keratitis, crystal, or protein deposition were negative. There was no improvement with an empirical trial of frequent topical fluorometholone acetate 0.1% (Flarex). With 6 months of abstinence from scleral lens wear, the deposits became less dense; however, after resumption of scleral contact lens wear, new refractile deposits reappeared. The donor cornea remained clear at 5 months’ postoperative follow-up. Conclusion This case of interstitial keratitis is unique because of the absence of a clear infectious etiology. Wear of scleral contact lenses was the most likely cause. Previous LASIK and cross-linking may have played a role; however, both were many years before this presentation. The role of omalizumab, an anti-immunoglobulin E therapy, remains unknown.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Connell et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa989404f884e66b532595https://doi.org/10.66574/001c.144805
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluation of corneal topography, tear film function and conjunctival impression cytology after long-term scleral contact lens wear in keratoconus patients2021 · 5 citations
  2. 2Evaluation of Infectious Crystalline Keratitis with Confocal Microscopy in a Case Series1997 · 51 citations
  3. 3Subclinical keratoconus and inflammatory molecules from tears2009 · 320 citations
  4. 4Roles of matrix metalloproteinases in the cornea: A special focus on macular corneal dystrophy2021 · 21 citations
  5. 5Keratocyte Differentiation Is Regulated by NF-κB and TGFβ Signaling Crosstalk2022 · 7 citations