PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice0 citations

Supervised Machine Learning Models for Ocular Sagittal Height Prediction Incorporating Corneoscleral Profile Data

View Full Paper
TGTimoteo González-CrucesMCMiriam Carrillo-PulidoFAFrancisco Javier Aguilar-Salazar

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop machine learning models for predicting ocular sagittal height using eye data.
  • Retrospective cohort study of 100 eyes used anterior eye data from topography and tomography.
  • Data collected included keratometry, eccentricity, white-to-white distance, and corneoscleral junction metrics.
  • Four machine learning models were created to predict ocular sagittal height at two chord lengths.
  • Comparisons were made using topographical data alone and combined with tomographical data.
  • The Random Forest model showed the highest predictive accuracy with r=0.88 for the 10-mm chord and r=0.77 for the 14-mm chord.
  • Adding tomographic data did not significantly improve model performance over topographical data alone.
  • The model's error is considered clinically acceptable for soft contact lens fitting.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop supervised machine learning (ML) models to predict ocular sagittal height (OC-SAG), using anterior eye data derived from topography and tomography. METHOD: ology: A retrospective cohort of 100 eyes provided data such as keratometry, eccentricity, white-to-white distance, and corneoscleral junction (CSJ) metrics through anterior segment optical coherence tomography (CASIA 2). Four supervised ML models were developed to predict OC-SAG at 10 mm and 14 mm chord lengths, using either topographical data alone or both topographical and tomographical data. RESULTS: The model with the strongest predictive accuracy for the validation sample was the Random Forest, both for the 10-mm chord (r=0.88; MAE=28.16±26.81 μm) and the 14-mm chord (r=0.77; MAE=73.56±61.31 μm; flat corneal meridian, topography-based model). The inclusion of tomographic data, such as measurements related to the CSJ, did not significantly improve the performance of the models compared with using topographic data alone. CONCLUSIONS: Adding tomographic predictors did not significantly improve model performance. Despite reduced performance for longer chords, the observed error could be considered clinically acceptable for soft contact lens fitting. The study demonstrated the potential of ML in predicting OC-SAG, providing an accessible estimation method for all clinicians to support decision-making.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

González-Cruces et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa989404f884e66b532650https://doi.org/10.1097/icl.0000000000001277
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper