PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Sexuality & Culture0 citationsOpen Access

Bridging Borders with an Intersectional Approach: Intimate Partner Violence Experiences among Bisexual Women in Brazil and Italy

View Full Paper
TAThaís de Castro Jury ArnoudCFClarissa Pinto Pizarro de FreitasVBValeria Bruno

Key Points

  • This research identifies intimate partner violence prevalence and intersectional risk factors among bisexual women in Brazil and Italy.
  • Quantitative study involving 2521 bisexual women
  • Descriptive and multilevel analysis (MAIHDA) of individual heterogeneity
  • Examined interactions across country, race/ethnicity, income, and age strata
  • 81.4% of participants experienced intimate partner violence in their lifetime
  • Fetishization reported by 64.1% was the most prevalent type of violence
  • Additive factors explained 86.5% of IPV risk variance across strata

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed at: identifying the prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization among Brazilian and Italian Bisexual women, considering bi-specific expressions of violence; and investigating how intersectional positions are associated with IPV victimization risk. Participated in this quantitative study 2521 bisexual women. Descriptive and Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA) were employed to model interactions across country, race/ethnicity, income, and age strata, allowing for the examination of interlocking oppressions. This methodological approach avoided single-axis thinking, which is inconsistent with intersectionality core assumptions. Main results: 81.4% reported having experienced IPV in their lifetime, with prevalence rising 42,6% as examples and bi-specific expressions were listed. Most prevalent typologies: fetishization (64.1%), invalidation (59.46%), psychological (55.41%), and sexual violence (44.33%). Additive effects of country, race/ethnicity, wage, and age explained 86.5% of between-stratum IPV risk variance, and 13.5% remained unexplained, suggesting residual intersectional effects at stratum level in this sample. The highest risk-stratum was Brazilian bisexual women with lower income, part of a racially marginalized group, and within the 18 to 24 age range (87.5% predicted probability). The lowest-risk stratum was composed of Italian bisexual women who were not race/ethnic minority, with lower income, and ages above 25 years old (59.4% predicted probability). The results unveil the transnational nature of bi-misogyny, while also revealing Global North–South intersectional inequalities rooted in colonial exploitation. They underscore the need for co-produced interventions, blending Northern funding with Southern epistemologies, with the aim of promoting safer spaces for bisexual women of different intersectional identities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Arnoud et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69faa1eb04f884e66b532a10https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-026-10591-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Bisexual Women in a Romantic Relationship: Coming out and Internalized Binegativity in Same/Different Gender Couples2024 · 6 citations
  2. 2Youth Oppression as a Technology of Colonialism: Conceptual Frameworks and Possibilities for Social Justice Education Praxis2015 · 83 citations
  3. 3Bisexual Spaces2013 · 6 citations
  4. 4Interseccionalidades, categorias de articulação e experiências de migrantes brasileiras2008 · 271 citations
  5. 5Racism in Europe: Characteristics and Intersections With Other Social Categories2022 · 44 citations