PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Eng—Advances in Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

Enhanced Puzzle Optimization Algorithmfor Complex Engineering Design Problems

View Full Paper
HKHasan KanakerEAEssam AlhroobHAHammoudeh Alamri

Key Points

  • This research focuses on improving the performance of the Enhanced Puzzle Optimization Algorithm (EPOA) for engineering design issues.
  • Introduced a hybrid approach integrating uniform crossover, random-resetting mutation, and elitism into EPOA.
  • Formalized EPOA's update rules and provided pseudocode and flow diagrams.
  • Conducted comprehensive tests on the CEC2022 benchmark suite and on six classical constrained engineering problems.
  • EPOA ranked 1 on 11 of 12 functions in benchmark tests, significantly reducing error rates.
  • Achieved strong balance in exploration and exploitation across various engineering designs.
  • Demonstrated high robustness in finding solutions even with complex constraints.

Abstract

This paper introduced the Enhanced Puzzle Optimization Algorithm (EPOA), a hybrid metaheuristic that augmented the original Puzzle Optimization Algorithm (POA) with uniform crossover, random-resetting mutation, and explicit elitism. The contribution does not lie in inventing these operators individually, since they are classical search components, but in integrating them into POA’s two-phase search dynamics to address premature convergence, diversity loss, and best-solution preservation in a targeted manner. This paper formalized EPOA’s update rules, provided pseudocode and flow diagrams, and enforced bound handling for box-constrained problems. Comprehensive tests on the CEC2022 single-objective benchmark suite (F1–F12) showed that EPOA attained rank 1 on 11 of 12 functions and rank 3 on the remaining case, with large error reductions relative to baseline POA (e.g., on F1, the mean error dropped from 62.836 to 0.004; on F6, the mean error dropped from 2370.962 to 7.239). The method was further evaluated on six classical constrained engineering design problems (welded beam, tension/compression spring, speed reducer, pressure vessel, three-bar truss, and cantilever beam). Statistical indicators such as the mean and standard deviation were used to assess robustness. The results showed that EPOA delivered a strong exploration–exploitation balance and robust solution quality across rugged landscapes and real-world constraints.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kanaker et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69faa1eb04f884e66b532a29https://doi.org/10.3390/eng7050217
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper