PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 20260 citations

Palm and Eucalyptus waste-derived biochars for removing imidacloprid and myclobutanil from pesticide- contaminated water.

View Full Paper
OAOsama I. AbdallahSSSayed M. SalehSGSherif B Abdel Ghani

Key Points

  • To evaluate palm petiole and eucalyptus leaf biochars as sorbents for removing pesticides from contaminated water.
  • Prepared biochars from palm and eucalyptus plant materials
  • Conducted batch adsorption experiments to assess removal efficiency
  • Analyzed adsorption kinetics and equilibrium using various models
  • PPB removed 87.4% of imidacloprid and 92.1% of myclobutanil, outperforming ELB's removal rates
  • Adsorption was highest at pH 7, 25 °C, and 24 h contact time
  • Langmuir and Freundlich models were best at describing adsorption data

Abstract

Two biochars, palm petiole biochar (PPB) and eucalyptus leaf biochar (ELB), were prepared from palm (Phoenix dactylifera) petioles and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus sp.) leaves and evaluated as low-cost sorbents for the removal of imidacloprid and myclobutanil from aqueous solutions. Batch adsorption experiments were conducted to examine the effects of adsorbent dose, pH, temperature, contact time, and initial pesticide concentration. The highest removal was achieved at pH 7, 25 ± 1 °C, 24 h contact time, a biochar dose of 5 g L⁻¹, and an initial concentration of 50 mg L⁻¹ for each pesticide. Thermodynamic analysis indicated that the adsorption process was spontaneous and exothermic. Adsorption kinetics were evaluated using pseudo-first order and pseudo-second-order models, whereas equilibrium data were analyzed using the Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, and Dubinin-Radushkevich isotherm models. Among the tested equilibrium models, Langmuir and Freundlich provided the best fit to the adsorption data. PPB showed stronger practical removal performance than ELB. Under rapid-treatment conditions using 100 mg of biochar, PPB removed 87.4% of imidacloprid and 92.1% of myclobutanil, whereas ELB removed 66.6% and 80.0%, respectively. These findings demonstrate that PPB and ELB, particularly PPB, are promising eco-friendly sorbents for the treatment of pesticide-contaminated water and concentrated agricultural point-source wastewaters.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abdallah et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69faa1eb04f884e66b532b93https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-51008-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Optimum Green Synthesis, Characterization, and Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles Prepared from an Extract of Aloe fleurentinorum2024 · 30 citations
  2. 2A novel and eco-friendly Algae amino-modified nanoparticles with significant environmental effect for the removal of As(III) and As(V) from water2024 · 6 citations
  3. 3Phenology and abundance of date palm mite Oligonychus afrasiaticus (McGregor) (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia2021 · 12 citations
  4. 4Optimizing a low added value bentonite as adsorbent material to remove pesticides from water2019 · 37 citations
  5. 5Water adsorption on carbon - A review2017 · 362 citations