PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Urban Studies0 citations

Manufactured housing and the dialectics of enclosure and commoning

View Full Paper
DGD. Asher Ghertner

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze manufactured housing communities within the context of urban marginality and related frameworks.
  • Comparative insights from fieldwork in US migrant labor camps and informal settlements in India.
  • Application of conceptual frameworks including infrastructural violence and territorialized stigma.
  • Identifies how MHCs contribute to urban marginality and face threats from corporate consolidation.
  • Discusses the implications of infrastructural violence and administrative neglect on residents' wellbeing.
  • Highlights the dialectics of commoning and enclosure within the context of gentrification.

Abstract

This commentary draws on comparative insights from fieldwork on migrant labor camps in the US and informal settlements in India to argue that manufactured housing communities (MHCs) are central to understanding urban marginality in North America. It does so by using three conceptual frameworks: infrastructural violence, territorialized stigma, and enclosure. Infrastructural violence manifests through MHCs’ segregation into hazard-prone geographies and substandard infrastructural networks, and through regulatory abandonment that produces preventable suffering among residents. Territorialized stigma links place-based degradation to negative stereotypes about “trailer trash,” creating administrative neglect and blocking governmental responsiveness to resident needs. Finally, the dialectic of commoning and enclosure reveals how MHCs enable collective land uses and informal economies essential to social reproduction yet face growing threats from corporate consolidation. Private equity investors benefit from regulatory constraints on new construction and immobile tenants to densify, gentrify, and standardize communities under the guise of improvement, squeezing common land uses into privatized and aestheticized landscapes. Taken together, these frameworks show MHCs to be contested sites of peripheral urbanization that demand more explicit theorization in urban studies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

D. Asher Ghertner (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69faa25e04f884e66b5330c0https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980261444506
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper