PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Petroleum Geoscience1 citations

Advanced crossplot analysis through physics-informed velocity prediction: a machine learning solution for reservoir characterization in the Guantao Formation of the Bohai Bay Basin, China

View Full Paper
WQWu QunhuWYWU YanjiaSLShihao Liu

Key Points

  • This research aims to improve shear wave velocity prediction using a physics-informed neural network.
  • Developed a physics-informed neural network integrating Kuster–Toksöz effective medium theory.
  • Validated the model using measured shear wave velocity from formations in Bohai Bay Basin.
  • Conducted lambda-mu-rho analysis and 3D seismic inversion to identify reservoir characteristics.
  • KT-PINN model achieved R2 = 0.96, outperforming traditional rock physics model (R2 = 0.81).
  • Demonstrated clear discrimination of VpVs ratios for oil and water-saturated rocks.
  • Identified premium reservoir intervals with porosity > 20% and oil saturation > 60%.

Abstract

Accurate prediction of shear wave velocity (Vs) is crucial for seismic interpretation, reservoir characterization, and geomechanical analysis in hydrocarbon exploration. This study introduces a physics-informed neural network (PINN) that integrates Kuster–Toksöz (KT) effective medium theory with data-driven learning to enhance shear wave velocity prediction and derive formation elastic parameters. The KT model provides the governing physical equation within the PINN framework, ensuring predictions adhere to established rock physics principles while leveraging neural network pattern recognition capabilities. The KT-PINN was validated using measured shear wave velocity from multiple formations in the basin, demonstrating superior performance (i.e., R 2 = 0.96) compared to the rock physics model (R 2 = 0.81) and standard neural networks (R 2 = 0.91). The results show that the KT-PINN model maintained physical consistency, enabling a reliable crossplot for hydrocarbon detection, with clear discrimination between fluid types in terms of their VpVs ratios (1.82-1.97 for oil versus 1.97-2.2 for water), and lambda-mu-rho analysis ( λ ρ - μ ρ ) (12-18 for oil and 18-21 GPa×g/cm³ for water-saturated rocks), and Poisson's ratio domains ( ν = 0.25-0.35 for oil-saturated and ν = 0.35-0.45 for water). In addition, physics-informed 3D seismic inversion further identified premium reservoir intervals with porosity > 20% and oil saturation > 60%, concentrated in channel sandstones around the CB323 and CB327 wells. These findings demonstrate the scalability of well-log predictions to field-scale reservoir models, establishing KT-PINN as a robust combination of rock physics and machine learning for hydrocarbon detection in geologically complex settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Qunhu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69faa28f04f884e66b5330c7https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2025-128
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Physics-informed multi-task learning for permeability prediction and probabilistic HFU modeling: a case study from the Lower Bahariya Reservoir, Shahd SE field Egypt2026
  2. 2A Hybrid Physics-Informed and Data-Driven Approach for Predicting Water Volume in Oil Reservoirs with Explainable AI2025
  3. 3PHYSICS-INFORMED NEURAL NETWORKS FOR ACCURATE RESERVOIR SIMULATION AND ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY PREDICTION IN HETEROGENEOUS FORMATIONS2026
  4. 4Neural Network Model for Predicting Shear Wave Velocity Using Well Logging Data2024 · 4 citations
  5. 5Predicting petrophysical properties from hyperspectral borehole data2024