PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 20260 citations

Substructure in redMaPPer clusters and its impact on X-ray morphology and scaling relations

View Full Paper
RTR. TuomainenAFA. FinoguenovJCJ. Comparat

Key Points

  • The study aims to quantify substructure in galaxy clusters and investigate its effects on X-ray morphology and scaling relations.
  • Analyzed clustering using HDBSCAN on redMaPPer galaxy cluster catalog.
  • Cross-matched optical substructure with the eROSITA X-ray morphology catalog.
  • Assessed scaling relations between X-ray luminosity and optical richness for clusters.
  • Statistically assessed properties of substructure and its prevalence in clusters.
  • Approximately 40% of clusters exhibit substructure.
  • Clusters with substructure show higher X-ray luminosity at fixed richness compared to relaxed systems.
  • A significant correlation exists between optical substructure and disturbed X-ray morphologies, especially in high-mass clusters.

Abstract

Numerical simulations of hierarchical structure formation predict that galaxy clusters retain significant dark matter substructure, a signature of their ongoing assembly. This substructure is traced by both the spatial distribution of member galaxies and perturbations in the hot intracluster medium. Merging events significantly impact the thermodynamic state of clusters, introducing scatter in observable mass scaling relations and thereby affecting their use as precision cosmological probes. We statistically quantified the prevalence and properties of substructure in optical galaxy clusters and directly investigated its impact on X-ray morphology and scaling relations, leveraging new data from the DECaLS Legacy Survey and the SRG/eROSITA all-sky survey. We applied the hierarchical density-based clustering algorithm HDBSCAN to the redMaPPer galaxy cluster catalog to identify and characterize substructure from the probabilistic membership assignments. This provides a refined membership catalog and a classification of each cluster as containing substructure or not. We then cross-matched this sample with the eROSITA X-ray morphology catalog to correlate optical substructure with a comprehensive set of X-ray morphological parameters. Finally, we analyzed the scaling relation between X-ray luminosity and optical richness for clusters with and without substructure. Substructure is a common feature, present in approximately 40% of clusters; a quarter of the full sample exhibits a fractional contribution to richness in excess of 35%. We find a highly significant correlation between optical substructure and disturbed X-ray morphologies, a trend that is strongest for high-mass clusters. The clusters with substructure also drive a stronger redshift evolution in the scatter of the LX-łambda relation. At low redshifts (z < 0. 2), they display a systematically higher X-ray luminosity at fixed richness compared to relaxed systems. We demonstrate that substructure identification with redMaPPer is viable and essential for enhancing the precision of cluster cosmology. We attribute the enhanced effect of mergers on X-ray properties at low redshifts to the increased density contrast of low-redshift cool cores and longer substructure survival times, which are possibly due to the suppression of disruptive mixing by effects such as magnetic draping. At lower cluster richness, a discordance between X-ray morphology and the merging state indicates a growing relative importance of active galactic nucleus feedback in governing X-ray morphology.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tuomainen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69faa2b504f884e66b5335e0https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202557729/pdf
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper