PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026The Cambridge Law Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Identifying Delegated Legislation: A New Two-Stage Test

View Full Paper
RTRobert Brett TaylorAWAdelyn L.M. Wilson

Key Points

  • To address limitations in identifying delegated legislation and propose a more effective testing framework.
  • Review existing tests for identifying delegated legislation.
  • Propose a two-stage test: first a source-and-form test, then a legislative-character test.
  • Apply the new test to various ambiguous legislative instruments.
  • Identified inadequacies in current tests for delegated legislation.
  • Proposed a new category of 'innominate' delegated legislation.
  • Demonstrated the applicability of the new tests in clarifying legislative instruments.

Abstract

Abstract This article considers the adequacy of the tests for identifying delegated legislation and highlights limitations in these tests relating to instruments made under ambiguous powers. This article, accordingly, proposes a new two-stage test for identifying delegated legislation. The long-standing source-based test should be expanded to become a “source-and-form” test as the primary or first-stage test. However, where this fails to identify the nature of the instrument because the powers granted in the enabling Act are ambiguous, this article proposes a new second-stage test: the “legislative-character” test. This article then applies the new test to three types of instruments of an ambiguous nature, revealing that they should be understood as examples of what this article identifies as a new category of “innominate” delegated legislation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Taylor et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69faa30204f884e66b53389ahttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197326101457
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper