PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Science, Health, and Environment as Social Worlds: A Framework for Studying Innovation and Inequality

View Full Paper
MUMaureen Chinonye Uruakpa

Key Points

  • The central aim is to develop a framework for understanding how innovation in science, health, and the environment creates and perpetuates inequalities.
  • Developed a theoretical framework integrating sociology of science, medical sociology, and political ecology.
  • Examined climate adaptation strategies in rural Nigeria as a case study.
  • Analyzed environmental innovations such as solar-powered irrigation and mini-grids.
  • Showed that innovation is socially embedded and influences power relations.
  • Identified weaknesses in institutional frameworks that limit equitable access to resources.
  • Demonstrated how environmental innovations reinforce rural–urban divides and gendered vulnerabilities.

Abstract

Abstract Innovation in science, health, and the environment is often celebrated as a driver of progress, yet it simultaneously reproduces inequalities across social, economic, and geographic lines. This article, “Science, Health, and Environment as Social Worlds: A Framework for Studying Innovation and Inequality”, develops a theoretical framework that integrates insights from the sociology of science, medical sociology, and political ecology. By treating these domains as overlapping social worlds, the framework emphasizes that innovation is not merely technical but socially embedded, shaped by institutions, policies, and power relations. To illustrate this approach, the article examines climate adaptation in rural Nigeria, where environmental innovations such as solar-powered irrigation, mini-grids, and drought-tolerant crops are deployed unevenly. Weak institutional frameworks, fragmented governance, financial barriers, and infrastructural disparities limit equitable access, reinforcing rural–urban divides and gendered vulnerabilities. The case study demonstrates how innovation both empowers communities and reproduces inequality, highlighting the need for inclusive governance and equitable resource distribution. The article concludes by suggesting that future research should compare adaptation strategies across African contexts to better understand how innovation can serve as a tool for social transformation rather than exclusion.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Maureen Chinonye Uruakpa (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69faa30204f884e66b53396fhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20018931
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper