PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Neurology3 citationsOpen Access

Intrathecal Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

View Full Paper
CKChristopher Elnan KvistadTKTorbjørn KråkenesTHTrygve Holmøy

Key Points

  • To evaluate the neuroregenerative effects of intrathecal autologous mesenchymal stem cells in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis.
  • Conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled trial design
  • Administered a single dose of mesenchymal stem cells intrathecally
  • Analyzed changes in evoked potentials and evaluated safety through adverse events
  • Performed brain MRI measures and serum biomarker assessments
  • Explored CSF through proteomic profiling.
  • No significant neuroregenerative effects detected in evoked potentials at 12 months
  • Identified reductions in several inflammation-related proteins at 6 months
  • Reported 1 serious adverse event possibly related to MSC treatment, and common effects like fever and low back pain
  • Noted spinal MRI abnormalities with nerve root complications observed at 6 months.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is an unmet need for neuroregenerative therapies in multiple sclerosis (MS). Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have shown immunomodulatory and regenerative effects in preclinical models and early clinical studies. Intrathecal administration may enhance therapeutic potential by direct delivery to the CNS. However, randomized, placebo-controlled trials are needed to establish safety and efficacy. The objective of this trial was to assess whether a single intrathecal administration of autologous MSCs could provide evidence of a neuroregenerative effect in progressive MS. METHODS: cells/kg) in a crossover design. The primary end point was the change in latency of combined evoked potentials at 6 months. Secondary end points included safety, brain MRI measures, functional and ophthalmologic assessments, and serum biomarkers at 6 and 12 months. Exploratory analyses comprised proteomic profiling of CSF. Outcomes were analyzed using baseline-adjusted regression models. RESULTS: = 0.054), but neither were sustained at 12 months. Exploratory CSF proteomics revealed reductions in multiple inflammation-related proteins at 6 months. One serious adverse event was deemed probably related to MSC treatment. Common adverse events included fever (n = 9) and low back pain (n = 10) after MSC administration, and spinal MRI abnormalities with fluid loculations and nerve root clumping (n = 7) at 6 months. One patient developed chronic coccygeal pain attributed to arachnoiditis. DISCUSSION: A neuroregenerative effect was not detected, although interpretation may be limited by the small sample size. Adverse events suggest an acute localized inflammatory reaction after MSC administration. Our findings suggest that intrathecal administration of MSCs in progressive MS should be approached with caution in future studies. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that, in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis, treatment with a single intrathecal administration of autologous mesenchymal stem cells does not provide neuroregenerative effect, as assessed by a composite evoked potential score. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04749667); registered February 8, 2021; first patient enrolled August 9, 2021.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kvistad et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbe2b3164b5133a91a203ahttps://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000214915
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper