PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Health and Technology0 citationsOpen Access

Extended reality in rehabilitation: innovative or just an illusion? A scoping review of interventions for complex regional pain syndrome

View Full Paper
CWClaire B. WeissGLGwyn N. LewisNSNusratnaaz Shaikh

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of extended reality interventions in managing complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS).
  • Conducted a systematic search in health databases for XR-related CRPS articles.
  • Extracted data on study characteristics and intervention details.
  • Critiqued interventions using a custom framework for rehabilitation alignment.
  • Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria, showing diverse methodologies and participant characteristics.
  • All studies were deemed suitable for clinical use and justified theoretically.
  • Most studies indicated potential for reducing CRPS symptoms, with noted gaps in independence and cultural considerations.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Extended reality (XR) technologies, incorporating virtual and augmented reality, are increasingly being explored as potential adjuncts in the management of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). However, the appropriateness of these interventions in terms of their alignment with CRPS symptomatology, patient experiences, and rehabilitation principles remains unclear. This scoping review aimed to critically examine the current approaches used in XR-based rehabilitation for CRPS and assess their suitability for managing this condition. Methods A systematic search was conducted in several health databases for articles describing the use of XR for management of people with CRPS. Data were extracted on study characteristics and intervention details, and the intervention was critiqued using a custom framework designed to evaluate the incorporation of rehabilitation principles. Results Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. There was considerable diversity in study methodologies, participant characteristics, and technological approaches. All studies provided appropriate theoretical justifications of their intervention and were suitable for clinical use, while most showed potential for CRPS symptom reduction. However, there were significant gaps in the interventions related to fostering independence, feasibility of home use, potential for progression, and cultural considerations. Conclusions XR interventions show promise in certain aspects of CRPS management but opportunities exist for more comprehensive intervention delivery formats that address key rehabilitation principles. Future development and evaluation studies should place greater emphasis on fostering independent use, integration of user feedback, and overtly incorporate cultural considerations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Weiss et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbe2b3164b5133a91a2194https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-026-01078-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper