PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Open Philosophy0 citationsOpen Access

The Jena Wissenschaftslehre as an Answer to Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment

View Full Paper
IRIves Radrizzani

Key Points

  • The central aim is to illustrate how Fichte's development of the Wissenschaftslehre engages with and responds to Kant's critiques.
  • Analyzes Fichte's writings from the Jena period
  • Examines the relationship between the Wissenschaftslehre and Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment
  • Explores the implications of Fichte’s theory of sollicitation
  • Establishes that Fichte finds Kant's bridging solution inadequate
  • Demonstrates that his theory of sollicitation addresses gaps in both theoretical and practical philosophy
  • Argues that Fichte's work safeguards philosophy as a unified discipline

Abstract

Abstract This article demonstrates that the systematic progress in the elaboration of the Wissenschaftslehre during Fichte’s Jena period results from a continuous confrontation with Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment , which Fichte first read and reviewed in Leipzig. Fichte deems insufficient Kant’s proposed solution to bridge the “uncalculable” ( unübersehbare Kluft ) between theoretical and practical philosophy, a gap that jeopardizes philosophy as science. Only the theory of sollicitation ( Aufforderungstheorie ), first developed in the Foundations of Natural Right and later placed at the core of the New Presentation of the Wissenschaftslehre , allows for overcoming the unfinished nature of Kantian critique, refuting the accusation of solipsism raised by Jacobi, and safeguarding the unity of philosophy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ives Radrizzani (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbe2f2164b5133a91a2359https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2025-0106
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper