PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Chemical Engineering Science0 citationsOpen Access

Modeling of catalytic partial oxidation and dry reforming of CH4 in fixed-bed reactors: Comparison of 3D particle-resolved (PRCFD) and 1D simulations

View Full Paper
ASAkash ShirsathMHMatthias HettelEDEric Daymo

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare 3D and 1D models for catalytic fixed-bed reactors focusing on correlations in different geometries.
  • Modeling of catalytic fixed-bed reactors using both 3D particle-resolved and 1D simulations.
  • Comparison conducted for CPOX and DRM with various Reynolds numbers and tube-to-particle diameter ratios.
  • Evaluation of over 100 correlation combinations for heat and mass transfer in the 1D model against 3D reference solutions.
  • Findings highlight that no single correlation set fits all scenarios; the choice depends on bed geometry and reaction type.
  • Conditions where 1D models are reliable versus situations necessitating full CFD analysis are defined.

Abstract

• Modeling of catalytic fixed-bed reactors with 3D particle-resolved and 1D simulations • Comparison of three beds with two chemistries (CPOX, DRM) for four Reynolds numbers. • Beds had tube to particle diameter ratios: 1.1/2/7 and particle counts: 23/86/6000. • Investigation of impact of various correlations for submodels in 1D approach. • Best choice of correlations for 1D model depends on bed geometry and reaction type. This work compares a detailed 3D particle-resolved CFD model and a 1D pseudo-continuum model for catalytic fixed-bed reactors for three different tube-to-particle diameter ratios (1.1/2/7) over a wide range of particle Reynolds numbers (29/145/290/1450). Dry reforming of methane and catalytic partial oxidation are simulated using microkinetics mechanisms in both frameworks. In the 1D model, over 100 combinations of literature correlations for heat and mass transfer and overall heat transfer coefficients are evaluated against 3D reference solutions. The study shows that no universal correlation set is valid. Instead, the best choice of correlations for the 1D model depends on bed geometry and reaction type. The results delineate conditions where simplified 1D models remain reliable and where fully resolved CFD becomes necessary for reactor design and analysis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shirsath et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbe2f2164b5133a91a23adhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2026.124172
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Modeling and simulation of CO<sub>2</sub> methanation in a fixed-bed reactor: Evaluation of 1D pseudo-homogeneous approaches.2025
  2. 2Numerical Simulation of Hydrodynamics and Heat Transfer in a Reactor with a Fluidized Bed of Catalyst Particles in a Three-Dimensional Formulation2024 · 3 citations
  3. 3Critical role of transport phenomena in the performance of a catalytic fixed bed reactor for the CO2 hydrogenation to CH4 evaluated by modeling and simulation2024 · 3 citations
  4. 4Three-dimensional evaluation of operating conditions and channel design in a wall-coated microreactor for dry reforming of methane2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5Comparison of 1D and 3D models for the thermochemical conversion of carbonaceous pulverized particles2026