PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Journal of Vibration and Control0 citations

Modeling and numerical simulation of propagating cylindrical shock waves under magneto-radiative fields

View Full Paper
RRajeshRYRam Prasad Yadav

Key Points

  • The research aims to analyze cylindrical shock wave propagation in a magnetized and radiatively absorbing medium.
  • Developed a mathematical model and governing equations for shock wave dynamics.
  • Formulated a boundary-value problem and solved it using a finite difference scheme.
  • Conducted grid-independence tests to ensure numerical stability and solution accuracy.
  • Identified the shock front and confirmed the existence of solutions near it.
  • Illustrated the influence of the adiabatic constant on density and pressure variations.
  • Compared results between magnetized and non-magnetized shock wave scenarios.

Abstract

In the present investigation, a mathematical model is developed to perform a comprehensive self-similar analysis of cylindrical shock wave propagation in a magnetized and radiatively absorbing medium. The governing equations of mass, momentum, energy, magnetic induction, and radiation transport are formulated by incorporating a transverse magnetic field and a generalized monochromatic absorption law. By employing an appropriate similarity transformation, the coupled magneto-radiative system is reduced to a set of five nonlinear ordinary differential equations governing the dimensionless density, velocity, pressure, magnetic field, and radiation flux. The resulting boundary-value problem is solved numerically with performing finite difference scheme. The existence and uniqueness of solutions in the vicinity of the shock front are examined, and the sonic point is identified through a regularity condition. To ensure numerical stability and convergence of the finite difference scheme, grid-independence tests are performed to confirm the accuracy and reliability of the numerical results. A comparative study between magnetized and non-magnetized cases is carried out, and the influence of the adiabatic constant on the variations of density, velocity, pressure, magnetic field, and radiation flux behind the shock front is illustrated graphically.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rajesh et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbe2f2164b5133a91a24b9https://doi.org/10.1177/10775463261446626
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Control of incident shock wave/boundary layer interaction by concave surface2025 · 4 citations
  2. 2Magnetogasdynamics and Plasma Dynamics1962 · 340 citations
  3. 3Rarefaction waves and dispersive shock waves in fluid dynamics to the higher-order Gerdjikov–Ivanov model2025 · 5 citations
  4. 4Diffracted shock wave propagation in a pulsed volume discharge plasma2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5Analysis of an hypersonic magnetohydrodynamic shock layer2022 · 4 citations