PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Assessing the Role of AI as Expert Witnesses in Medical Negligence Cases Under Ghana's Evidence Act 1975

View Full Paper
KBKwesi Nana BoakyeAMAkosua Afia MensahOAOluwatobi Femi Adebayo

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the role of AI as expert witnesses under Ghana's Evidence Act 1975 in medical negligence cases.
  • Evaluates the legal and evidentiary challenges of AI in court settings.
  • Examines accountability issues related to AI-generated analyses.
  • Analyzes potential improvements in patient outcomes through AI-driven tools.
  • AI technology showcases diagnostic performance on par with human experts in medical fields.
  • Questions surrounding AI's admissibility and legal accountability arise in the context of medical negligence litigation.
  • Acknowledging AI's benefits while ensuring public protection and legal compliance is crucial.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming healthcare by achieving diagnostic and analytical performance that rivals or exceeds human medical experts in fields such as radiology, dermatology, and ophthalmology. Machine learning algorithms can analyze complex medical images, patient records, and biomarker data with high accuracy, efficiency, and consistency, offering potential solutions to critical healthcare access gaps. In Ghana, where the shortage of medical specialists is acute—particularly in rural areas with fewer than one radiologist per million people—AI-driven tools present opportunities to enhance general practice, improve patient outcomes, and expand access to essential medical services. This paper examines the legal and evidentiary challenges of integrating AI systems as expert witnesses in medical negligence litigation under Ghana’s Evidence Act 1975. While AI can provide reliable and precise analyses, questions arise regarding its admissibility in court, accountability, and alignment with existing legal frameworks designed around human expertise. Balancing innovation with ethical, liability, and transparency concerns is critical, as overly restrictive standards may hinder the adoption of AI solutions that could address systemic healthcare shortages. The study highlights the need for evidence-based policies that recognize AI’s potential while ensuring public protection, transparency, and legal compliance. It underscores the importance of updating legal and regulatory approaches to accommodate technological advancements, support judicial understanding of AI-generated evidence, and safeguard patient rights. By critically evaluating the admissibility and implications of AI as expert witnesses, this research contributes to ongoing discourse on harmonizing technology, healthcare delivery, and legal accountability in Ghana.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Boakye et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbe382164b5133a91a2b5bhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20038355
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ASSESSING THE ROLE OF AI AS EXPERT WITNESSES IN MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE CASES UNDER GHANA'S EVIDENCE ACT 19752025
  2. 2Artificial Intelligence Systems and Medical Negligence: An Overview and Perspective of a Case Study in Ghana Civil Procedure Rules, 2004 (C.I. 47)2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3AI and Medical Negligence2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Evaluating if Ghana's Health Institutions and Facilities Act 2011 (Act 829) Sufficiently Addresses Medical Negligence Risks from Integration of Artificial Intelligence Systems2024 · 20 citations
  5. 5Examining Ghana's National Health Insurance Act, 2003 (Act 650) to Improve Accessibility of Artificial Intelligence Therapies and Address Compensation Issues in Cases of Medical Negligence2024 · 10 citations