PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Marine Environmental Research0 citationsOpen Access

Crossing from shallow inshore to deep continental shelf habitats: Benthic-pelagic coupling and trophic position of the Lane snapper, Lutjanus synagris, in a tropical seascape

View Full Paper
RBRodrigo Ferreira BastosAGAlexandre Miranda GarciaTFThierry Frédou

Key Points

  • To assess the trophic position and habitat use of the Lane snapper in different marine environments.
  • Analyzed trophic support through mixing models based on benthic and pelagic sources.
  • Evaluated trophic position across various habitats including seagrass meadows and coastal reefs.
  • Compared trophic dynamics in shallow and mesophotic environments.
  • Trophic position increased with depth, indicating a correlation with fish size.
  • Benthic support was dominant in mangroves and shallow shelf habitats.
  • Pelagic support corresponds positively with depth, influenced by geological processes.

Abstract

N) of L. synagris, basal sources and consumers from both benthic and pelagic pathways to model trophic position (TP) and assess trophic support. TP were consistent regardless of whether basal sources or consumers served as baselines, although the model based on basal consumers produced narrower credible intervals. TP increased from inshore to continental shelf habitats, primarily reflecting increases in fish size; however, no significant differences were observed between shallow and mesophotic shelf areas. Mixing models based on basal consumer baselines further revealed that in seagrass meadows, coastal reefs, and mesophotic shelf habitats, the Lane snapper derives trophic support from both benthic and pelagic sources, whereas benthic support predominates in mangroves and shallow shelf habitats. Pelagic support showed a positive correlation with depth across the continental shelf, which could be related to physical and geological processes, such as upwelling near the shelf break and through submarine canyons, that augment pelagic subsidies, particularly when benthic production is limited at greater depths. In summary, our findings underscore the significance of both physical geological and biological drivers in shaping the trophic dynamics and ontogenetic habitat use of L. synagris. These insights emphasize the necessity of sustaining spatial connectivity among marine protected areas to maintain robust trophic interactions and overall ecosystem health.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bastos et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbe382164b5133a91a2c6dhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2026.108091
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1FISHES AS INTEGRATORS OF BENTHIC AND PELAGIC FOOD WEBS IN LAKES2002 · 714 citations
  2. 2Coral reef fish association with macroalgal beds on a tropical reef system in North-eastern Brazil2013 · 63 citations
  3. 3Benthic microalgal production in Onslow Bay, North Carolina, USA1992 · 144 citations
  4. 4Trophic structure and mercury distribution in a Gulf of St. Lawrence (Canada) food web using stable isotope analysis2010 · 166 citations
  5. 5To what extent do mesophotic coral ecosystems and shallow reefs share species of conservation interest? A systematic review2018 · 67 citations