PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026International Journal of Human-Computer Studies0 citationsOpen Access

Gaze dynamics reveal age-related physiological patterns across driving events

View Full Paper
GSGregor StrleKPKristina Stojmenova PečečnikJSJaka Sodnik

Key Points

  • To examine how gaze dynamics and physiological signals can distinguish driving events and reveal age-related patterns.
  • Participants completed a simulated driving scenario with physiological signals recorded during events.
  • Statistical analyses and machine learning techniques were used to classify driving events based on gaze features.
  • Gaze dispersion metrics and pupil responses were analyzed across different age groups.
  • Statistical analyses yielded significant modulation of gaze dispersion metrics.
  • Machine learning achieved 82.4% accuracy in classifying four driving events using gaze-based features.
  • Younger drivers displayed greater gaze variability compared to older drivers with more constrained exploration.

Abstract

Discriminating between multiple driving events using physiological signals remains challenging. This study examined whether gaze dynamics and pupil responses could distinguish multiple driving events and reveal age-related physiological patterns. Twenty-seven participants (12 young, 15 old) completed a simulated driving scenario featuring nine events while physiological signals were recorded. Statistical analyses revealed significant event-specific modulation of gaze dispersion metrics ( = 0.571–0.582, ). Gradient boosted trees achieved 82.4% accuracy (95% CI 74.3%, 89.8%) classifying four events (Bicycle, DeerAlert, LowGas, StopAtGasStation) using 7 gaze-based features, with SHAP analysis identifying horizontal deviation standard deviation and median as primary discriminators. Time-series motif discovery revealed consistent gaze motif amplitudes (3.0–3.4 z-scores) across events, while pupil motifs showed selective enhancement during monitoring tasks (3.1–3.8 z-scores). Age-stratified analyses uncovered distinct physiological patterns: younger drivers exhibited greater gaze variability with broader scanning patterns, whereas older drivers demonstrated elevated pupil motif amplitudes (particularly during LowGas: 3.88 vs. 3.18 z-scores) alongside more constrained visual exploration. The convergence of statistical, machine learning, and motif discovery approaches establishes gaze dynamics as sufficient for multiclass event discrimination in simulated driving. These findings demonstrate that gaze-based features alone can reliably distinguish between specific driving events, while motif analysis reveals temporal dynamics and age-related patterns that warrant further investigation in larger samples, providing a foundation for interpretable driver monitoring systems. • Gaze features achieve 82.4% accuracy discriminating four driving events. • Older drivers show elevated pupil motif amplitudes during constrained gaze. • Horizontal gaze deviation variability is the strongest event discriminator. • Time-series motifs expose age-specific physiological response patterns. • Convergent methods confirm robust gaze-based multi-event discrimination.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Strle et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbe382164b5133a91a2c6fhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103827
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper