PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026ACS Applied Energy Materials0 citations

Coordinated Interfacial Engineering and Time-Induced Bulk Trap Passivation Governing Performance Evolution in D18:Y6-Based Inverted Organic Solar Cells

View Full Paper
TTarunASA. SharmaSSSurya Prakash Singh

Key Points

  • This research focuses on enhancing the efficiency and stability of D18:Y6-based organic solar cells through interfacial engineering and bulk trap passivation.
  • Utilized ultrathin 2PACz interfacial layer at the anode interface.
  • Employed atomic force microscopy and high-resolution TEM for morphological analysis.
  • Conducted optical spectroscopy to assess light-harvesting efficiency.
  • Achieved a power conversion efficiency increase from 14.53% to 15.43% with interfacial engineering.
  • Open-circuit voltage increased from 0.81 V to 0.84 V post-engineering.
  • Demonstrated a further improvement to 16.05% efficiency after 15 days of intrinsic bulk trap passivation.

Abstract

Interface and bulk traps critically limit the efficiency and operational stability of organic solar cells (OSCs) by inducing energetic disorder and trap-assisted recombination. Here, we elucidate the distinct and synergistic roles of interfacial engineering and time-induced bulk trap passivation in inverted D18:Y6-based OSCs. An ultrathin ethanol-processed 2-(9H-carbazol-9-yl)ethyl phosphonic acid (2PACz) interfacial layer is introduced at the anode interface (ITO/ZnO/D18:Y6/2PACz/MoO3/Ag) to passivate interfacial traps and improve energetic alignment. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) and high-resolution–transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) reveal enhanced interfacial uniformity without perturbing the bulk morphology, while optical spectroscopy confirms unchanged light-harvesting. Photoluminescence quenching and space-charge-limited current analysis demonstrate improved interfacial charge transfer, yielding a ∼43% enhancement in hole mobility and a ∼19% reduction in hole trap density. Consequently, power conversion efficiency (PCE) increases from 14.53% for reference devices to 15.43% with interfacial engineering, accompanied by an increase in open-circuit voltage (VOC) from 0.81 to 0.84 V. Remarkably, upon storage, intrinsic bulk trap passivation further reduces trap density and enhances carrier mobility, leading to a PCE of 16.05% after 15 days. The combined effect of interfacial engineering and intrinsic bulk trap passivation results in ∼10.4% relative improvement in device efficiency compared to the initial reference device. These findings establish coordinated interfacial and bulk trap management as a powerful strategy for achieving high-performance organic solar cells.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tarun et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbe382164b5133a91a2d05https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.6c00132
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Configurational Isomerization‐Induced Orientation Switching: Non‐Fused Ring Dipodal Phosphonic Acids as Hole‐Extraction Layers for Efficient Organic Solar Cells2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2π-Extended Nonfullerene Acceptor for Compressed Molecular Packing in Organic Solar Cells To Achieve over 20% Efficiency2024 · 580 citations
  3. 3Device engineering of non-fullerene organic photovoltaics with extrapolated operational T80 lifetime over 45,000 h in air2024 · 60 citations
  4. 4Triarylborane-BODIPY conjugate: An efficient non-fullerene electron acceptor for bulk heterojunction organic solar cell2021 · 19 citations
  5. 5Interface state recombination in organic solar cells2010 · 405 citations