THE authority of constitutional courts to interpret judicial Comparative study))

After the judicial work of the functional work in general ,it is represented by being a purely legal function that provides judicial protection for the laws, and the constitutional courts accordingly and being at the top of the pyramid of the judicial organization of the courts, which were granted powers in the field of constitutional oversight and constitutional interpretation to guarantee public rights and freedoms by issuing constitutional rulings to indicate constitutionality of the laws ,and these courts derive their complementary jurisdiction after issuing the constitutional ruling to indicate how to implement it in the manner ideally ,and by virtue of the nature of constitutional rulings ,which in principle do not cause a change in rights and legal positions ,whether by creation or amendment, and by what it entails of absolute authority for its rulings, the constitutional judicial ruling enjoys binding and finality towards all individuals and institution , and the possibility of implementing constitutional rulings without obstacles , constitutional court have ,according to the procedural laws regulating the work of courts, the ability to interpret the ruling issued by them in the event of ambiguity and obscurity that hinders implementation ,in accordance with objective and procedural controls that govern judicial work and in a manner that does not conflict with the nature of , constitutional courts and the absolute authority of their ruling . Keywords: interpretation of judicial ruling ,scope of interpretation of judicial ruling ,legal nature of interpretation of judicial ruling, objective controls for interpretation of judicial ruling.