PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Journal of Ecology0 citationsOpen Access

Realistic species loss has little effect on local resource depletion and competitive pressure in a temperate wet meadow

View Full Paper
EJEva JaníkováALAleš LisnerMKMarie Konečná

Key Points

  • This research examines how realistic species loss impacts competitive ability and resource use in plant communities.
  • Created a species richness gradient simulating species loss over 6 years in a wet meadow
  • Transplanted phytometers (Holcus lanatus and Plantago lanceolata) into communities of varying richness
  • Measured relative growth rate and functional traits of phytometers in competing and non-competing environments
  • Phytometers showed lower growth rates in vegetation compared to gaps, indicating strong competitive pressure
  • Species richness had weak effects on competitive ability across communities
  • Measures of local resource depletion did not significantly explain phytometer performance or traits

Abstract

Abstract Biodiversity loss has been repeatedly demonstrated to decrease community resistance to colonization, increasing their sensitivity to invasive species. Based on these results, Elton's hypothesis proposed that biodiversity loss reduces the competitive ability of plant communities by emptying ecological niches and, thus, increasing the availability of unused resources. Yet, direct evidence for the effect of diversity loss on resource use and the consequences for the community competitive ability remains scarce, especially under natural conditions. We created a species richness gradient (1–27 species on average) simulating a realistic species loss through the long‐term (6 years) removal of rare and subordinate species in a species‐rich oligotrophic wet meadow. To assess the effects of species richness on the competitive ability of communities, we transplanted phytometers of two species (the grass Holcus lanatus and the forb Plantago lanceolata ) into plots varying in species richness and into gaps where plant competition was eliminated. We then compared phytometers' performance (relative growth rate) and functional traits responses (vegetative height, leaf area, leaf nitrogen and phosphorus content, specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content). We also tested the effect of targeted species richness on local light interception, soil nutrient content, soil water content, and soil surface temperature and whether they could reliably explain phytometers' performance and trait responses. Both phytometer species showed a much lower relative growth rate in the vegetation than in gaps demonstrating strong responses to plant competition. However, the effects of species richness were surprisingly weak as all plant communities ranging from monocultures of a dominant species to the richest communities (27 species on average) exerted a similar competitive pressure. Surprisingly, almost none of our measures of local resource depletion explained trait or growth rate responses. Synthesis. Phytometers effectively quantified competitive pressure exerted by natural plant communities. However, the realistic loss of rare and subordinate species had only limited effects on community competitive ability, and these effects were not explained by changes in local resource depletion. This highlights the complexity of diversity–competition relationships and cautions against inferring invasion resistance from species richness alone.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Janíková et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbe3ca164b5133a91a3054https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.70335
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper