PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Journal of Gynecologic Surgery0 citations

Posterior Colpotomy for Laparoscopic Myomectomy Specimen Extraction

View Full Paper
RSR SullenderECE T Carey

Key Points

  • To show the technique of posterior colpotomy for removing fibroid specimens during laparoscopic myomectomy.
  • Demonstrated the posterior colpotomy approach in a video format.
  • Used a uterine manipulator to aid surgery.
  • Inserted a specimen retrieval bag into the posterior fornix for fibroid removal.
  • Posterior colpotomy was performed safely without complications.
  • Existing research supports posterior colpotomy as a practical extraction approach.
  • Technique may offer advantages over traditional abdominal incisions.

Abstract

The purpose of this video is to demonstrate the posterior colpotomy approach for removal of a fibroid specimen during a laparoscopic myomectomy. The surgery took place in an academic hospital with a minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon. A 30-year-old G0 female with a fibroid planning a laparoscopic myomectomy. She had a history of a spontaneous abdominal wall infection requiring excision with general surgery which was complicated by delayed wound healing. She was consented for posterior colpotomy specimen extraction rather than extension of a port site given this history. Intervention: We describe our approach to creation of a posterior colpotomy to remove a fibroid during a laparoscopic myomectomy. After performing the myomectomy, we kept a uterine manipulator in place to antevert the uterus and placed a laparoscopic specimen retrieval bag in the posterior fornix of the vagina. Laparoscopic monopolar scissors were used to palpate the bag in the posterior cul de sac and make an incision overlying the bag between the uterosacral ligaments. The bag was advanced into the pelvis and the specimen was placed into the bag. We then laparoscopically sewed the colpotomy site. While not as commonly performed as it is often easier and faster to extend and close an abdominal incision, existing research suggests that posterior colpotomy extraction represents a safe, practical, and sometimes preferable approach. This video highlights one such implementation of this useful tool for surgeons to employ and discusses existing research on the safety and outcomes of this approach.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sullender et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbe3ca164b5133a91a31a8https://doi.org/10.1177/10424067261448735
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Transvaginal Specimen Extraction at Laparoscopy Without Concomitant Hysterectomy: Our Experience and Systematic Review of the Literature2013 · 64 citations
  2. 2A Simple Approach to Specimen Retrieval via Posterior Colpotomy Incision2015 · 12 citations
  3. 3Transvaginal versus Port-Site Specimen Retrieval after Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2022 · 20 citations
  4. 4Transvaginal contained tissue extraction after laparoscopic myomectomy: a cohort study2017 · 45 citations
  5. 5Electric Motorized Morcellator Versus Transvaginal Extraction for Myoma Retrieval After Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Propensity-matched Analysis2014 · 39 citations