PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Political Incommunicability and Post-Meaning Democracy

View Full Paper
AVAlejandro Vaillant Valdes

Key Points

  • The research examines the disjunction between democratic imaginaries and political communication in contemporary society.
  • Comparative analysis of political events in various national contexts
  • Exploration of the effects of social media on public debate
  • Investigation of the relationship between structural incommunicability and socioeducational deterioration
  • Identifies a breakdown in collective intelligibility within political discourse
  • Suggests that extremisms thrive in the absence of shared understanding
  • Highlights the need for reconstruction of socioeducational processes and political communication to address the crisis

Abstract

ENGLISH ABSTRACT - RESUMEN EN ESPAÑOL - RESUMO EM PORTUGUÊS ABSTRACT This paper examines the growing disjunction between democratic imaginaries and the actual conditions of political communication in contemporary societies. It argues that democratic politics increasingly operates under conditions of structural incommunicability, in which discourse, reception, and decision-making no longer belong to a shared symbolic universe. While social media were initially expected to expand public debate and pluralize voices, they have instead contributed to fragmentation, affective polarization, and the erosion of collective intelligibility. The paper advances the hypothesis that this communicational breakdown is inseparable from a deeper socioeducational deterioration that has undermined the development of higher cognitive functions necessary for abstraction, critical judgment, and social understanding. Together, these processes produce a structural short-circuit between politics, institutions, and society, rendering the classical notion of public opinion increasingly unviable. Through comparative references to recent political events in different national contexts, the article shows how formal democratic procedures persist even as shared comprehension dissolves, allowing legitimacy to operate independently of understanding. In this environment, extremisms do not initiate political decay but rather occupy a symbolic and institutional void produced by the collapse of mediation and cognition. The paper concludes that the current crisis is civilizational in nature and cannot be addressed through technical adjustments to political communication alone, but rather demands a profound reconstruction of socioeducational processes, symbolic mediations, and the material conditions that make possible social dialogue and mutual understanding.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alejandro Vaillant Valdes (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbefc0164b5133a91a3b27https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20033414
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper