PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Annals of Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Programmatic assessment in undergraduate diagnostic radiography education: a conceptual framework informed by the Australian context

View Full Paper
MCMinh ChauKBKelly Bentley-SpuurBOBismark Ofori-Manteaw

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a programmatic assessment framework tailored for radiography education to improve assessments and learner outcomes.
  • Proposes a framework integrating core programmatic assessment principles into curriculum design.
  • Focuses on longitudinal assessment, feedback mechanisms, and evidence generation across diverse clinical contexts.
  • Highlights the importance of competence committees and shared assessment practices.
  • Demonstrates how the model supports better insight into learner development and consistent capability assessment.
  • Addresses the need for fairness and transparency in assessments across varying clinical placements.
  • Enhances readiness for independent practice in radiography through continuous curriculum improvement.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Programmatic assessment offers a system-level approach to evaluating students' competence by integrating multiple low-stakes assessments, longitudinal evidence and expert judgement. Although widely adopted across several health education disciplines in Australia, radiography education providers have not implemented programmatic assessment at a programme or course level. This paper proposes a radiography-specific programmatic assessment framework. The objective is to translate core programmatic assessment principles into curriculum design strategies that strengthen feedback, improve the defensibility of decisions and enhance national workforce readiness. DISCUSSION: The paper outlines key purposes of programmatic assessment in undergraduate radiography education including supporting learning, strengthening feedback mechanisms, tracking developmental progress and enabling defensible decisions grounded in longitudinal evidence. Critical design considerations include aligning assessments with a capability framework, generating evidence across diverse clinical contexts, prioritising narrative feedback and using portfolios as central evidence repositories. The analysis highlights the importance of competence committees for high-stakes decisions and the need to support shared assessment practices across varied clinical placement environments. The proposed radiography model integrates six components: capability framework, evidence generation, evidence aggregation, interpretation, decision-making and system learning. This model addresses radiography's multimodality workflow, training variation across sites and accreditation requirements for fairness, transparency and systematic monitoring. CONCLUSION: Programmatic assessment offers a coherent approach to strengthening radiography education by supporting clearer insight into learner development and ensuring consistent evidence of capability achievement across clinical environments. When adapted to radiography's multimodality practice and evolving workforce demands, programmatic assessment enhances readiness for independent practice and supports continuous curriculum improvement.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chau et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fc2b608b49bacb8b34789ahttps://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2026.2665915
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper