Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce major adverse cardiovascular events compared to ACEIs in patients with STEMI?
4,915 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) pooled from 5 RCTs
Sacubitril/valsartan
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)composite
In patients with STEMI, sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduces MACE and heart failure hospitalizations and improves LVEF compared to ACEIs, without increasing adverse safety events.
Background: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) continues to be a leading cause of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality worldwide, posing an ongoing clinical and public health burden. Although angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) remain integral to guideline-recommended therapy following STEMI, recent evidence indicates that sacubitril/valsartan may offer superior cardioprotective benefits. This meta-analysis aims to systematically evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan versus ACEIs in the management of patients with STEMI. Methods: PubMed and Cochrane databases were systematically searched from inception to July 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing sacubitril/valsartan and ACEIs in patients with STEMI. Data were synthesized using a random-effects model to calculate risk ratios (RRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs), each with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A P -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of five RCTs comprising 4915 participants were included in the final analysis. Sacubitril/valsartan therapy was associated with a significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) RR: 0.66 (0.50, 0.86); P = 0.002 and hospitalizations for heart failure (HHF) RR: 0.67 (0.49, 0.92); P = 0.01. Treatment with sacubitril/valsartan also significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) WMD: 2.60 (1.53, 3.68); P < 0.00001 and reduced NT-proB-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels (WMD: −268.89 −422.35, −115.42; P = 0.0006). No significant differences were observed in the risk of recurrent myocardial infarction RR: 1.02 (0.39, 2.71); P = 0.96), CV death [RR: 0.78 (0.61, 1.01); P = 0.06, or all-cause mortality RR: 0.85 (0.68, 1.06); P = 0.15. Safety analyses revealed no significant differences in the risk of cough RR: 0.63 (0.15, 2.72); P = 0.54, hypotension RR: 1.68 (0.97, 2.91); P = 0.06, worsening renal function RR: 0.51 (0.22, 1.21); P = 0.13, or hyperkalemia RR: 0.59 (0.17, 2.01); P = 0.40. Conclusion: Sacubitril/valsartan therapy significantly reduces MACE and HHF and improves LVEF in patients with STEMI, without increasing the risk of adverse safety outcomes. Future well-powered randomized trials are needed to confirm these results and support clinical guideline recommendations.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ajay Kumar
Rohit Kumar
Simran Kumari
Annals of Medicine and Surgery
Bahria University
Dow University of Health Sciences
Sukkur IBA University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kumar et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fc2ca48b49bacb8b348196 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000004666