Abstract Small near-Earth asteroids (NEAs), diameters < 150 m, represent the most numerous yet one of the least well-understood populations among near-Earth objects, despite their potential hazard. Their rapid fading after discovery makes it challenging to obtain sufficient follow-up observations for characterisation studies, leaving a critical gap in our knowledge of their taxonomic distribution. We present results from a robotic follow-up program using the South African Astronomical Observatory’s Lesedi telescope. This system uses automated scripts to rapidly identify NEA discoveries reported to the Minor Planet Center and execute follow-up observations within hours of detection. Using multifilter photometry in the g , r , and i bands, we performed taxonomic classification of 59 small NEAs, with absolute magnitudes H ranging from 22 ≤ H < 29, using a trained machine learning algorithm. Our results reveal that the composition of the small NEA population slightly differs from the population of larger size, pointing to size-dependent taxonomic variations relevant to impact hazard assessments. Specifically, we find an approximately 1:1 ratio between stony types (S+V+Q) and carbonaceous/metallic types (C+X), broadly consistent with earlier studies of larger NEAs. However, we identify a significantly higher fraction of X-type asteroids (almost a third of the observed sample) compared to previous taxonomic surveys of larger NEAs. This study provides a compositional analysis of sub-150 m NEAs and suggests that the taxonomic distribution may vary with size, highlighting the importance of dedicated small-object characterization programs to better understand the most abundant, and thus most likely source of Earth impactors.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Thobekile S. Ngwane
Nicolas Erasmus
Paul Groot
The Planetary Science Journal
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ngwane et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7cd4bfa21ec5bbf05beb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/psj/ae5b69