The presence of non-lacunar covert brain infarcts on noncontrast CT was associated with worse 3-month outcomes (mRS<3: 51.8% vs. 73.1%; p=0.002) and showed high etiological concordance.
Cohort
Yes
Does the presence of non-lacunar covert brain infarcts on noncontrast CT predict stroke etiology and worse 3-month functional outcomes in patients with first-ever symptomatic ischemic stroke?
628 patients with first-ever symptomatic ischemic stroke from a retrospective multicenter registry, plus a separate cohort of 758 patients for deep learning model development and 1,680 patients across three independent external cohorts for validation.
Presence of non-lacunar covert brain infarcts (CBIs) on noncontrast CT (NCCT) and automated detection using a deep learning-based model.
Absence of non-lacunar covert brain infarcts (CBIs).
3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores, stroke etiology concordance, and deep learning model diagnostic performance (sensitivity and specificity).hard clinical
Non-lacunar covert brain infarcts on noncontrast CT are associated with worse 3-month functional outcomes in stroke patients and can be reliably detected using a deep learning model.
Abstract Background and aims Non-lacunar covert brain infarcts (CBIs) on noncontrast CT (NCCT) are frequently overlooked due to subtle hypoattenuation and unclear clinical implication, yet they often indicate high-risk etiologies such as large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA) or cardioembolism (CE). We investigated the clinical-etiological significance of non-lacunar CBIs and developed a deep learning–based model for automated detection. Methods We analyzed 628 patients with first-ever symptomatic ischemic stroke from a retrospective multicenter registry. We compared baseline characteristics, stroke etiology, and 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores between patients with and without non-lacunar CBIs. Non-lacunar CBIs were subtyped as LAA- or CE-related to evaluate etiological concordance with the index stroke. A deep learning model was developed using a separate cohort (n=758) and validated in three independent external cohorts (n=1,680). Results Non-lacunar CBIs were identified in 13.5% (85/628) of patients. Their presence was associated with older age (75 vs 70 years; p=0.014), atrial fibrillation (34.1% vs 17.5%; p=0.002) and arterial occlusion (14.6% vs 7.0%; p=0.004). Etiological concordance was substantial: 48.5% of LAA-related CBIs matched a symptomatic LAA stroke, and 46.2% of CE-related CBIs matched a symptomatic CE stroke. Patients with non-lacunar CBIs had worse 3-month outcomes (mRS3: 51.8% vs. 73.1%; adjusted p=0.002) and impaired recovery trajectories (p0.001). The detection model achieved sensitivities 0.722–0.755 and specificities 0.797–0.932 across validation cohorts. Conclusions Non-lacunar CBIs on NCCT serve as sentinel markers showing high rate of etiological concordance with future devastating strokes and associated with poorer outcomes. An NCCT-based deep learning model shows robust generalization, enabling early identification and etiologic work-up. Conflict of interest WS Ryu, M Lee, D Kim and G Park are employees of JLK Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea. SH Yeom is a former employee of the same company. Figure 1 - belongs to Methods Figure 1 - belongs to Results
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Seunghan Yeom
Wi-Sun Ryu
M. Lee
European Stroke Journal
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Korea University Medical Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yeom et al. (Fri,) conducted a cohort in first-ever symptomatic ischemic stroke (n=3,066). Presence of non-lacunar covert brain infarcts (CBIs) vs. Absence of non-lacunar CBIs was evaluated on 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score <3 (p=0.002). The presence of non-lacunar covert brain infarcts on noncontrast CT was associated with worse 3-month outcomes (mRS<3: 51.8% vs. 73.1%; p=0.002) and showed high etiological concordance.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7e5cbfa21ec5bbf0697e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.229