This in-vitro study compared the protective effects of a 5000-ppm fluoride dentifrice with an anti-erosive 1450-ppm formulation containing stannous chloride and chitosan under erosive, abrasive, and erosive/abrasive conditions. A total of 240 bovine enamel specimens were randomly assigned to three models: erosion followed by abrasion (EA), erosion only (E), and abrasion only (A) (n = 80 per model; n = 20 per treatment). Four treatments were tested: artificial saliva (AS), a conventional 1450-ppm NaF and SnF2 dentifrice (CT; Colgate Total), an anti-erosive 1450-ppm AmF dentifrice containing stannous chloride and chitosan (EPOS; Elmex professional Opti-Schmelz), and a 5000-ppm NaF dentifrice (CD; Colgate Duraphat). Erosive challenge consisted of 1% citric acid (pH 2.6) for 2 min. In EA, erosion was followed by brushing (1 min); in E, specimens were exposed to AS or slurry without brushing; in A, specimens were brushed without prior erosion. Brushing was performed with a manual toothbrush at 60 strokes/min under 2.5 N. Dentifrices were applied as slurries (1:6.5, artificial saliva). Ten cycles were performed with 1 h storage in artificial saliva between cycles. Enamel surface loss (µm) was measured by contact profilometry at baseline and after 10 cycles. Data were analysed using Kruskal–Wallis and Conover post-hoc tests. Significant differences were observed in EA and E (p < 0.05), but not in A (p = 0.40). In E, only EPOS reduced enamel surface loss compared with AS (p = 0.01), while CT and CD showed no significant differences. In EA, a significant difference was found only between AS and EPOS. CD did not show superior protective effects in any model. Within the limitations of this in-vitro study, increasing fluoride concentration to 5000 ppm did not enhance protection against erosive or erosive/abrasive enamel surface loss. These findings suggest that formulation-related factors, including stannous-based interactions, may be more relevant than fluoride concentration alone for preventing erosive tooth wear.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mayer et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7e90bfa21ec5bbf06ded — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08546-6
Silvia Mayer
Florian J. Wegehaupt
Blend Hamza
BMC Oral Health
University of Zurich
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...