Do large IMA, multiple lumbar arteries, and anticoagulation predict the need for intervention in patients with type II endoleaks after EVAR?
207 patients who underwent endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), of which 78 developed type II endoleaks (T2E)
Presence of large inferior mesenteric artery (>4 mm), multiple lumbar arteries (>6), or anticoagulation use
Absence of these risk factors
Time to first intervention for type II endoleakhard clinical
An inferior mesenteric artery >4 mm, >6 lumbar arteries, and anticoagulation use are strong predictors for requiring embolization in patients with type II endoleaks after EVAR.
Introduction Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is the primary treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Despite favorable early outcomes, lifelong surveillance is essential as endoleaks remain a major cause of reintervention. Among these, type II endoleaks (T2E) remain controversial regarding optimal management. This study aimed to identify factors associated with intervention for T2E using time-to-event analysis and predefined anatomic thresholds. Secondary objectives included comparing outcomes between T2E patients with (intT2E) and without (nointT2E) intervention. Methods A retrospective review of EVAR procedures from 2011-2024 was performed. Patients with newly diagnosed or persistent T2E were identified on completion and follow-up CT angiography. Patients were categorized as intT2E or nointT2E. Multivariable Cox regression evaluated time to first intervention, and logistic regression served as sensitivity analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves assessed freedom from intervention by inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) size. Results Among 207 EVAR patients, 78 (37.6%) developed T2E over a mean 3.4 ± 2.4 years. Nineteen (24.3%) required intervention. IntT2E patients were younger (74.9 ± 6.8 vs 78.3 ± 7.9 years, P = 0.02), had more frequent anticoagulation use (47.4% vs 20.3%, P = 0.02), larger IMAs (4.2 ± 0.6 vs 3.3 ± 0.7 mm, P 4 mm occurred in 68.4% of intT2E vs 8.5% of nointT2E ( P 4 mm independently predicted intervention (HR 7.18, 95% CI 1.97-26.16, P 4 mm (OR 23.4, 95% CI 6.17-88.6, P 6 lumbar arteries (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.10-15.98, P = 0.02), and anticoagulation (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.17-10.6, P = 0.02) as predictors. Conclusions Approximately one-quarter of T2E patients required embolization. IMA >4 mm was the strongest predictor of intervention, while anticoagulation and increased lumbar artery number also increased risk. Management should prioritize risk-stratified surveillance and selective intervention.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Camila Esquetini Vernon
Houssam Farres
Camilo Polania Sandoval
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
WinnMed
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Vernon et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7eb0bfa21ec5bbf06ee8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744261450590