Abstract Modern lithium-ion batteries increasingly incorporate pure silicon into the anode to boost energy density. However, practical deployment remains limited by silicon’s large cycling-induced volume changes, typically assessed by pouch cell dilatometry. While informative at the electrode-stack level, this method provides no direct insight into underlying particle-level behaviour. Here, we combine operando dilatometry with high-resolution charge photometry to correlate electrode-level expansion with single-particle swelling in state-of-the-art silicon anodes. We examined anode materials: (i) silicon-carbon (Si-C) composites prepared by silicon vapor deposition into porous carbon, and (ii) dense micron-sized silicon prepared by jet milling. Dilatometry revealed pronounced non-linear thickness evolution for Si–C composites, with reduced expansion at low state-of-charge, whereas micron-sized silicon exhibited linear expansion. Charge photometry reproduced these trends at the particle-level, showing that the nonlinear swelling of Si–C composites arise from internal porosity that delays external volume change during early lithiation. Dilatometry also captured significant first-cycle expansion irreversibility for both materials, while charge photometry showed largely reversible particle swelling, indicating that irreversibility originates from cell-level processes rather than intrinsic active material behaviour. Overall, these results establish charge photometry as a practical lab-based tool for resolving operando particle-scale chemo-mechanics and highlights the benefits of nano-engineered composite architectures for mitigating silicon expansion
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Arvind Pujari
Alice J. Merryweather
Silke Berger
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pujari et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7ef7bfa21ec5bbf07508 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.129634
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: