Abstract Background and aims Individual risk factors for ischemic stroke (IS) are known, but their cumulative, gender-specific impact on IS subtypes is unclear. We developed multifactorial models to identify key risk combinations for atherothrombotic, cardioembolic, and lacunar subtypes in men and women aged 46-75. Methods This retrospective study compared IS patients (n = 384) with a comparison group of patients with chronic cerebral ischemia (n = 289), all aged 46-75. Subtypes were classified per TOAST criteria. Multifactorial logistic regression with stepwise exclusion built models, with quality assessed by ROC curve analysis. Results Models revealed distinct gender-specific risk combinations. For men, atherothrombotic IS was associated with carotid atherosclerosis, a history of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA), and high-grade arterial hypertension (AH); cardioembolic IS with ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation (AF), TIA, and high-grade AH; and lacunar IS with previous IS and high-grade AH. For women, Diabetes Mellitus (DM) was a key differentiator for atherothrombotic (TIA, carotid atherosclerosis, DM, high-grade AH) and lacunar (DM, previous IS, high-grade AH) subtypes. Cardioembolic IS in women was linked to a history of myocardial infarction, AF, TIA, and high-grade AH. The models demonstrated high predictive accuracy (AUC: men = 0.922; women = 0.927). Conclusions This study identifies distinct, gender-specific risk factor combinations for IS subtypes. These non-invasive models provide a valuable tool for stratifying patient risk, enabling personalized primary and secondary stroke prevention. Conflict of interest Kostiantyn Stepanchenko and Alla Zhidkova nothing to disclose
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kostiantyn Stepanchenko
Alla Zhidkova
European Stroke Journal
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics
Kharkiv State Academy of Culture
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Stepanchenko et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7f0dbfa21ec5bbf0773f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1796