Abstract Number: Esoc2026a1239 Regionalization of a Large Rural United States Telestroke Network

Abstract Background and aims Interfacility transfers in rural areas are challenging due to limited ambulance and bed availability, image sharing issues, and access disparities. Regional transfers to strategically located primary stroke centers can reduce time to care, decrease helicopter use, support local economies, and conserve comprehensive stroke center (CSC) resources. This study established a primary stroke center as a regional transfer center (rSTC) within a telestroke network. Methods Over one year, stakeholders created regionally appropriate transfer workflows defined as patients without large vessel occlusion, low likelihood for neurosurgical decompression or critical illness within a rSTC and 4 surrounding centers. Continuous education and prospective case logs were maintained by the rSTC stroke coordinator and a retrospective chart review was conducted one year following the intervention period. Results Of 99 patients requiring transfer, 73 (73. 7%) went to the rSTC, with an average stay of 2. 1 days, no deaths, and no secondary CSC transfers. The remaining 26 (26. 3%) were sent to the CSC, with longer stays (10. 6 days) and higher mortality (23. 1%). Transfers to the rSTC were faster (60 min vs. 188 min). Financial analysis showed significant EMS savings (455, 111) and local health system benefits (730, 000) when compared to the pre-intervention period. Conclusions Establishing an effective regional transfer model is possible with broad stakeholder engagement and regular network maintenance. rSTCs provide the right level of care for the right patient, improving efficient allocation of healthcare resources and avoiding futile transfers with costly admissions far from home while opening beds and reducing transfer times to CSCs. Conflict of interest Nothing to disclose