In-service girder-end restraint devices in long-span suspension bridges inevitably degrade, which directly alters their mechanical parameters and affects bridge service safety. It is imperative to quantitatively identify girder-end restraint parameters for their performance evaluation. Because current methods typically require laboratory testing after disassembly, this study proposes a novel, hybrid method, driven by monitoring data and numerical modeling, for the in situ online calibration of girder-end restraint parameters in suspension bridges. First, an inversion method for girder-end restraint forces (GERFs) was derived by establishing an explicit mapping relationship between GERFs and vehicle-induced girder-end displacement (VIGED) differences. Second, a physics-informed theoretical reconstruction model of the VIGED under longitudinal unconstrained conditions (LUC-VIGED) was established to estimate VIGED differences. On this basis, a statistical equivalence-based correction method was introduced to refine the reconstructed LUC-VIGED for operational bridges. Third, a decoupling and quantitative identification algorithm for the mechanical parameters of multirestraint devices was proposed. Finally, the proposed method was validated through numerical simulations and a case study on an in-service suspension bridge. It accurately identified girder-end restraint parameters, including damper damping coefficient and expansion joint stiffness, and showed good agreement with short-term field test results. These findings provide valuable insights for the performance evaluation of restraint devices in suspension bridges.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hai-Lun Gu
Dong-Hui Yang
Ting-Hua Yi
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Dalian University of Technology
Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture
CCCC Highway Consultants (China)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gu et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7f4fbfa21ec5bbf07bbf — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/jbenf2.beeng-8224