Interrupted oral anticoagulation after successful AF ablation reduced hemorrhagic events in patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ≤1 (RR 0.18; 95% CI 0.06-0.61; p=0.006) without increasing thromboembolic risk.
Meta-Analysis
Does interrupted oral anticoagulation reduce hemorrhagic events without increasing thromboembolic events compared to uninterrupted oral anticoagulation in patients after successful atrial fibrillation catheter ablation?
128,144 patients with atrial fibrillation after successful catheter ablation (pooled from 11 studies: 1 non-randomized controlled trial, 8 retrospective cohort studies, and 2 prospective cohort studies)
Interrupted oral anticoagulation (vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants)
Uninterrupted oral anticoagulation
Thromboembolic and hemorrhagic cerebrovascular events stratified by CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores ≤1 and ≥2hard clinical
Interruption of oral anticoagulation after successful AF ablation appears safe and reduces hemorrhagic risk without increasing thromboembolic events across all CHA₂DS₂-VASc strata.
Abstract Background and aims The safety of suspending oral anticoagulation (OAC) after successful atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation remains unclear, and prior studies have not stratified outcomes by CHA₂DS₂-VASc score. This meta-analysis evaluates thromboembolic and hemorrhagic cerebrovascular events in patients with interrupted versus uninterrupted OAC following ablation. Methods A comprehensive search of electronic databases through December 2025 identified studies comparing interrupted versus uninterrupted OAC after successful AF ablation, including vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants. One non-randomized controlled trial, eight retrospective cohort studies (two with propensity score matching), and two prospective cohort studies were included. Outcomes included thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events stratified by CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores ≤1 and ≥2. Results Among 128,144 patients with AF after ablation (62,224 uninterrupted; 65,920 interrupted; 11 studies), no significant difference in thromboembolic events was observed between groups: CHA₂DS₂-VASc ≤1 (RR 0.87, 95%CI 0.51–1.48, p=0.61) and CHA₂DS₂-VASc ≥2 (RR 1.12, 95%CI 0.82–1.52, p=0.49). Interrupted OAC was associated with a significant reduction in hemorrhagic events in both risk strata: CHA₂DS₂-VASc ≤1 (RR 0.18, 95%CI 0.06–0.61, p=0.006) and CHA₂DS₂-VASc ≥2 (RR 0.27, 95%CI 0.09–0.78, p=0.02). Conclusions Interruption of OAC after successful AF ablation appears safe across CHA₂DS₂-VASc strata, with reduced hemorrhagic risk and no increase in thromboembolic events. These findings question routine post-ablation OAC continuation and warrant confirmation in randomized controlled trials. Conflict of interest Amiel Armando Aragon Cortes. Nothing to disclose Figure 1 - belongs to Results Figure 2 - belongs to Conclusions Figure 3 - belongs to Conclusions
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Amiel Aragon Cortes
Andrea Beltran
Rodrigo Pille Camarillo
European Stroke Journal
Twin Cities Orthopedics
Universidad de Guanajuato
Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cortes et al. (Fri,) conducted a meta-analysis in Atrial fibrillation after successful catheter ablation (n=128,144). Interrupted oral anticoagulation vs. Uninterrupted oral anticoagulation was evaluated on Thromboembolic events in patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ≤1 (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.51-1.48, p=0.61). Interrupted oral anticoagulation after successful AF ablation reduced hemorrhagic events in patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ≤1 (RR 0.18; 95% CI 0.06-0.61; p=0.006) without increasing thromboembolic risk.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7f4fbfa21ec5bbf07c35 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.462
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: