Abstract Background and aims In acute stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO), identifying a core-perfusion mismatch guides reperfusion therapy in extended time windows, but perfusion imaging is not universally available. We assessed whether the ASPECTS score is associated with core-perfusion mismatch and could serve as a surrogate imaging marker. Methods We retrospectively analyzed a large multicenter international cohort of consecutive AIS-LVO (ICA or M1) imaged 4.5-24 hours from last time seen well, with baseline CT- or MR-perfusion imaging. Core-perfusion mismatch was defined as a volume ≥ 15 mL and ratio ≥ 1.8 using automated software. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to identify optimal ASPECTS cutoffs for mismatch classification. Results Overall, 531 patients were included (CT, n = 182; MRI, n = 349). Core-perfusion mismatch was present in 86% of the CT cohort and 62% of the MRI cohort. In the MRI cohort, ASPECTS predicted mismatch with an AUC-ROC of 0.843 (95%CI, 0.797-0.890), with an optimal cutoff of ≥6, yielding a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) of 0.87, 0.72, 0.84, and 0.77, respectively. In the CT cohort, the AUC-ROC was 0.801 (95%CI, 0.698-0.904), with an optimal cutoff of ≥7, yielding a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 0.74, 0.81, 0.96, and 0.34, respectively. Conclusions The high PPV of ASPECTS≥6 on MRI and ≥ 7 on CT supports their potential use as pragmatic inclusion criteria for patient selection in future late-window AIS-LVO trials when perfusion imaging is unavailable, as surrogate markers of salvageable tissue. Conversely, low ASPECTS values –especially on CT– do not exclude core-perfusion mismatch. Conflict of interest Nothing to disclose.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pierre Seners
Nicole Yuen
Davide Strambo
European Stroke Journal
Stanford Medicine
University Hospital of Bern
University Hospital of Lausanne
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Seners et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7f86bfa21ec5bbf07fbc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.054