River ice products from optical satellites are still dominated by binary ice–water or ice–snow discrimination, leaving within-ice spectral heterogeneity largely unresolved. This study benchmarks how far river ice can be subclassified from multispectral reflectance alone on the Tibetan Plateau using Landsat 5/7, Landsat 8/9, and Sentinel-2 surface-reflectance imagery. We compiled 356 winter scenes acquired between 2000 and 2024 across eight Tibetan Plateau basins, delineated river ice using NDSI and RDRI, and extracted 24,674 pixel-level spectra. To define reproducible subclasses, we applied K-means clustering guided by the Silhouette Coefficient, Davies–Bouldin index, Calinski–Harabasz index, and Gap Statistic. Combined with stratified visual interpretation, this approach consistently supported four optical spectral subclasses: thin-snow-covered ice, thick ice cover, thin ice, and frazil ice. Within-sensor classification accuracy remained extremely high (overall accuracy ≥ 0.948; kappa ≥ 0.929), with the Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN) and tree ensembles performing best. Crucially, evaluating the optimal BPNN architecture revealed exceptional multi-dimensional generalizability: a Leave-One-Basin-Out spatial cross-validation yielded a stable average OA > 99% with an average Kappa > 0.98, while a unified multi-sensor model achieved a robust OA of 90.14% and a Kappa of 0.86. The most stable discriminative cues were visible-band brightness, reflectance turnover near ~0.7 μm, and shortwave-infrared sensitivity to effective thickness and surface wetness. These results provide a sensor-aware benchmark for practical optical river ice spectral subclassification and clarify which multispectral bands most strongly constrain subclass separability.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hanwen Zhang
Hui Li
Remote Sensing
Chinese Academy of Sciences
State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science
Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhang et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7f86bfa21ec5bbf08054 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18091437