Tenecteplase resulted in similar rates of mRS 0-1 at 90 days compared to standard medical treatment in acute ischemic stroke patients aged ≥80 years (21.4% vs 10.3%; OR 2.39; 95% CI 0.61-9.42).
RCT
1:1
Does tenecteplase improve the rate of modified Rankin scale (mRS) score 0-1 at 90 days in patients aged ≥ 80 years with acute ischaemic stroke and large vessel occlusion treated 4.5 to 24 hours after onset?
67 patients aged ≥ 80 years (out of 516 total trial patients) with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) due to anterior large vessel occlusion (LVO), with no access to endovascular thrombectomy, treated 4.5 to 24 hours after stroke onset.
Tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg
Standard medical treatment
modified Rankin scale (mRS) score 0-1 at 90 dayshard clinical
In a post hoc analysis of the TRACE-III trial, tenecteplase showed comparable efficacy and safety to standard medical treatment in patients aged ≥ 80 years with acute ischemic stroke treated in the 4.5 to 24-hour window.
Abstract Background and aims The risks and benefits of tenecteplase for very old patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) who were treated 4.5 to 24 hours after stroke onset are still unknown. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase for AIS patients aged ≥ 80 years. Methods We performed a post hoc analysis of TRACE-III trial. Patients with anterior large vessel occlusion (LVO) and no access to endovascular thrombectomy were randomized (1:1) to receive either 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase or standard medical treatment. The primary outcome was modified Rankin scale (mRS) score 0-1 at 90 days. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) within 36 hours and all-cause mortality within 90 days. Results Among the 516 patients in the TRACE-III trial, 67 (13.0%) aged ≥ 80 years. The percentage of mRS score of 0 or 1 at 90 days were similar between the tenecteplase and standard treatment groups in patients aged ≥ 80 years (21.4% vs. 10.3%; OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 0.61-9.42) and patients aged 80 years (34.3% vs. 26.8%; OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.95-2.15), with a non-significant interaction value of 0.48. The sICH (10.7% vs. 0.0% in aged ≥ 80 years group) and and all-cause mortality (28.6% vs. 20.5% in aged ≥ 80 years group) were similar between the two treatment therapies across age categories. Conclusions In patients with LVO who were not eligible for thrombectomy within 4.5 to 24 hours of onset, tenecteplase was comparable with standard medical treatment for efficacy and safety outcomes in patients aged ≥ 80 years. Conflict of interest All authors have nothing to disclose.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhixin Li
Jinfeng Yin
Yunyun Xiong
European Stroke Journal
Beijing Tian Tan Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Li et al. (Fri,) conducted a rct in acute ischaemic stroke (n=516). tenecteplase vs. standard medical treatment was evaluated on modified Rankin scale (mRS) score 0-1 at 90 days (OR 2.39, 95% CI 0.61-9.42). Tenecteplase resulted in similar rates of mRS 0-1 at 90 days compared to standard medical treatment in acute ischemic stroke patients aged ≥80 years (21.4% vs 10.3%; OR 2.39; 95% CI 0.61-9.42).
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7f86bfa21ec5bbf08086 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.347