Argatroban plus antiplatelet therapy improved good functional outcomes at 90 days compared to antiplatelet therapy alone (RR 1.10; 95% CI 1.06-1.14; p<0.00001).
Meta-Analysis (n=3,035)
Does argatroban combined with antiplatelet therapy improve functional outcomes and reduce early neurological deterioration in patients with acute non-cardioembolic stroke who did not receive reperfusion therapy?
3,035 patients with acute non-cardioembolic stroke who did not receive reperfusion therapy (pooled from 1 RCT and 5 observational cohorts)
Argatroban combined with antiplatelet therapy (APT)
Antiplatelet therapy (APT) alone
Good functional outcomes (modified ranking scale [mRs] scores 0-2), early neurological deterioration (END), intracraneal hemorrhage (ICH) and mortalityhard clinical
Argatroban combined with antiplatelet therapy may improve 90-day functional outcomes and reduce early neurological deterioration in patients with acute non-cardioembolic stroke without increasing bleeding or mortality.
Effect estimate: RR 1.10 (95% CI 1.06-1.14)
p-value: p=<0.00001
Abstract Background and aims Argatroban plus antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute non-cardioembolic stroke who did not receive reperfusion therapy is unclear. We conducted this meta-analysis to assess whether argatroban combined with antiplatelet therapy (APT) improved efficacy and safety neurological outcomes. Methods A database search up to December 2025 identified eligible studies, including one randomized controlled trial and five observational cohorts (2 Propensity-Score Matched) comparing argatroban plus APT with APT alone in 3,035 patients. The primary outcomes were good functional outcomes, defined as modified ranking scale (mRs) scores 0-2, early neurological deterioration (END), intracraneal hemorrhage (ICH) and mortality. Results Pooled analysis revealed that argatroban administration was associated with higher rates of mRS 0-2 at 90 days (RR=1.10, 95% CI: 1.06-1.14, p=0.00001), significant reductions in END (RR=0.57, 95% CI: 0.37-0.88, p=0.01. No significant differences emerged in NIHSS score changes (RR=0.10, 95% CI:-1.14-1.34, p=0.81), ICH (RR=0.94, 95% CI: 0.56-1.59, p=0.83) or 90-day mortality (RR=0.43, 95% CI: 0.15-1.23, p=0.11). Conclusions This meta-analysis suggests that argatroban plus APT in patients with non-cardioembolic stroke may improve good functional outcomes and reduce END, without altering NIHSS scores, ICH, nor mortality events. As the first meta-analysis addressing this question, our findings are concordant with the sole available randomized controlled trial, reinforcing the biological plausibility and clinical relevance of argatroban in this setting. These results strengthen the current evidence base and underscore the need for adequately powered randomized clinical trial. Conflict of interest Amiel Armando Aragon Cortes. Nothing to disclose Figure 1 - belongs to Methods Figure 2 - belongs to Results Table 1 - belongs to Conclusions Table 2 - belongs to Conclusions Table 3 - belongs to Conclusions Table 4 - belongs to Conclusions
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Amiel Aragon Cortes
Andrea Beltran
Rodrigo Pille Camarillo
European Stroke Journal
Twin Cities Orthopedics
Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía
Universidad Autónoma de Baja California
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cortes et al. (Fri,) conducted a meta-analysis in Acute non-cardioembolic stroke (n=3,035). Argatroban plus antiplatelet therapy (APT) vs. Antiplatelet therapy (APT) alone was evaluated on Good functional outcomes (mRS 0-2 at 90 days) (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.06-1.14, p=<0.00001). Argatroban plus antiplatelet therapy improved good functional outcomes at 90 days compared to antiplatelet therapy alone (RR 1.10; 95% CI 1.06-1.14; p<0.00001).
synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7fb8bfa21ec5bbf084e2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.464