Higher systolic blood pressure variability was associated with faster global cognitive decline (-0.001 points/year/mmHg, P=0.048) but did not explain the faster cognitive decline observed in women.
Cohort
Yes
Is higher systolic blood pressure variability associated with faster cognitive decline, and does it explain sex differences in cognitive decline in adults free of stroke and dementia?
20,432 participants free of stroke and dementia from five US longitudinal cohort studies (ARIC, CHS, FOS, MESA, and CARDIA), mean age 50.1 years, 54.5% female.
Higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) variability (intraindividual standard deviation of SBP across study visits)
Lower systolic blood pressure variability
Change in global cognitionsurrogate
Systolic blood pressure variability is independently associated with faster cognitive decline but does not explain the observed faster cognitive decline in women compared to men.
Abstract Background and aims Women have faster cognitive decline than men, but prior studies have not evaluated the role of blood pressure variability. Methods This pooled analysis included participants from five US longitudinal cohort studies (1971-2019): ARIC, CHS, FOS, MESA, and CARDIA. We estimated change in global cognition by sex using a linear mixed-effects model. Analyses adjusted for cohort, age, race, education, income, APOE, alcohol use, smoking, physical activity, myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation, cumulative risk factors (estimated fasting glucose, waist circumference, body mass index, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and mean systolic blood pressure SBP), and treatment (Model 1). BP variability (intraindividual standard deviation SD of SBP across study visits) was added in Model 2. All covariates were interacted with follow-up time. Results We included 20,432 participants free of stroke and dementia with complete covariate data; mean (SD) baseline age was 50.1 (16.6) years, 54.5% female, 19.6% Black, and 80.4% White. Median (IQR) follow-up was 22.1 (9.0-29.8) years. In Model 1, women’s global cognition declined significantly faster than men (-0.059 points/year, 95% CI -0.070, -0.048, P 0.001). After further adjustment (Model 2), higher SBP variability was associated with faster global cognitive decline (-0.001 points/year/mmHg, 95% CI -0.002, -0.000009, P = 0.048). The sex difference in decline (-0.058 points/year, 95% CI -0.069, -0.047, P 0.001) showed minimal change by adding SBP variability. Conclusions Even after accounting for cumulative vascular risk factors and other characteristics, SBP variability was independently associated with faster cognitive decline but did not suggest an explanation for the sex difference in cognitive decline. Conflict of interest Brian Stamm: nothing to disclose. Rachael Whitney: nothing to disclose. Wan-Ling Hsu: nothing to disclose. Wen Ye: nothing to disclose. Rebecca Gottesman: nothing to disclose. Kristine Yaffe: nothing to disclose. Hugo Aparicio: nothing to disclose. Timothy Hughes: nothing to disclose. W. T. Longstreth: receives support from NIH for several projects. Deborah Levine: reports grant funding from the NIH and consulting for Northwestern University and Tufts University on NIH-funded projects.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Brian Stamm
Rachael Whitney
Wan-Ling Hsu
European Stroke Journal
University of Washington
University of Michigan
University of California, San Francisco
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Stamm et al. (Fri,) conducted a cohort in Cognitive decline (n=20,432). Blood pressure variability (intraindividual standard deviation of SBP) was evaluated on Change in global cognition (-0.001 points/year/mmHg, 95% CI -0.002, -0.000009, p=0.048). Higher systolic blood pressure variability was associated with faster global cognitive decline (-0.001 points/year/mmHg, P=0.048) but did not explain the faster cognitive decline observed in women.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7fcdbfa21ec5bbf08683 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.006
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: