Abstract The calculus C was introduced by H. Wansing as a constructive logic with strong negation. In addition, C validates the theses of connexive logic that are attributed to Aristotle and Boethius. A further remarkable property of C is that it is a non-trivial but negation inconsistent system: it has a formula and its negation as theorems. From a bilateralist-minded perspective, such a contradiction can be seen as the existence of both a verification and a falsification of one and the same formula. Relatedly, it has been noted by Wansing that there seems to be a kind of correspondence between these two types of derivations when it comes to a proof of contradiction. Following this observation, we attempt in this paper to introduce a precise notion for such a correspondence. We thence establish that this correspondence obtains in propositional and first-order versions of C , via formulations of suitable sequent and tableau calculi.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Satoru Niki
Kanagawa University
Archive for Mathematical Logic
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Satoru Niki (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7fcdbfa21ec5bbf086fb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-026-01013-7
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: