Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate shorter duration (3 months) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. BACKGROUND: There have been few published reports of prospective randomized clinical studies comparing the safety and efficacy of shorter duration DAPT after DES implantation. METHODS: We randomly assigned 2, 117 patients with coronary artery stenosis into 2 groups according to DAPT duration and stent type: 3-month DAPT following Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES) implantation (E-ZES+3-month DAPT, n=1, 059) versus 12-month DAPT following the other DES implantation (standard therapy, n=1, 058). We hypothesized that the E-ZES+3-month DAPT would be noninferior to the standard therapy for the primary composite endpoint (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target revascularization, or bleeding) at 1 year. RESULTS: The primary endpoint occurred in 40 (4. 7%) patients assigned to E-ZES+3-month DAPT compared with 41 (4. 7%) patients assigned to the standard therapy (difference: 0. 0%; 95% confidence interval CI: -2. 5 to 2. 5; p=0. 84; p<0. 001 for noninferiority). The composite rates of any death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis were 0. 8% and 1. 3%, respectively (difference: -0. 5%; 95% CI: -1. 5 to 0. 5; p=0. 48). The rates of stent thrombosis were 0. 2% and 0. 3%, respectively (difference: -0. 1%; 95% CI: -0. 5 to 0. 3; p=0. 65) without its further occurrence after cessation of clopidogrel in the E-ZES+3-month DAPT group. The rates of target vessel revascularization were 3. 9% and 3. 7%, respectively (difference: 0. 2%; 95% CI: -2. 3 to 2. 6; p=0. 70). CONCLUSIONS: E-ZES+3-month DAPT was noninferior to the standard therapy with respect to the occurrence of the primary endpoint. (REal Safety and Efficacy of a 3-month dual antiplatelet Therapy following E-ZES implantation RESET; NCT01145079).
“With newer-generation DES, 6 months DAPT might be sufficient, and 3 months not completely off the wall in low-risk groups. Brief interruption of DAPT beyond 4 weeks might not be associated with a dramatic risk increase. However, the patient- and device-related criteria safely allowing early DAPT withdrawal or interruption still have to be determined. Until then, we should be cautious and do our best to avoid unplanned discontinuation of DAPT.”
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Byeong‐Keuk Kim
Interventional Cardiology
Myeong‐Ki Hong
Interventional Cardiology
Dong‐Ho Shin
Chonnam National University
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Yonsei University
Dankook University
Gachon University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kim et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69fdfee944d6484a6a0392fc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.043