PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Artificial Intelligence in Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Evidential reasoning-enabled deep learning for reliable treatment outcome prediction in cancer therapy

View Full Paper
XCXi ChenXDXiaoxu DengZZZhiguo Zhou

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a reliable prediction model for treatment outcomes in cancer therapy, particularly for TNBC and HNC.
  • Developed an evidential reasoning rule-enabled deep neural network (ER 2 -DNN) for prediction.
  • Implemented CNN-based image feature extraction and data augmentation techniques.
  • Evaluated prediction calibration using Expected Calibration Error (ECE) and Maximum Calibration Error (MCE).
  • The ER 2 -DNN model showed consistent predictive performance and well-calibrated confidence estimates across TNBC and HNC datasets.
  • Utilized only pre-treatment imaging data to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) in TNBC and lesion progression in HNC.
  • Achieved better uncertainty estimation and model trustworthiness compared to other fusion strategies.

Abstract

Treatment outcome prediction plays an important role in realizing personalized cancer therapy. In triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is widely used to downstage tumors and improve surgical outcomes. In head and neck cancer (HNC), early prediction of lesion progression can assist treatment planning. However, inter-patient heterogeneity in treatment response and tumor behavior limits the effectiveness of generalized treatment strategies. To address this issue, we developed an evidential reasoning rule-enabled deep neural network (ER 2 -DNN) for reliable outcome prediction in cancer therapy. The ER 2 -DNN combines Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based image feature extraction with data augmentation, Monte Carlo dropout, test-time augmentation and evidential reasoning rule (ER 2 ) fusion for generating uncertainty-aware prediction. Across both TNBC and HNC datasets, the model showed consistent predictive performance with well-calibrated confidence estimates. The ER 2 -DNN provides a framework for supporting individualized oncology decisions through reliable image-based modeling. • We present a unified ER 2 -DNN framework for predicting treatment outcomes: pCR in TNBC and lesion progression in HNC, using only pre-treatment imaging data. • We incorporate the Evidential Reasoning Rule (ER 2 ) to perform structured, reliability-weighted prediction fusion, enabling better uncertainty estimation and model trustworthiness. • We systematically evaluate prediction calibration using Expected Calibration Error (ECE) and Maximum Calibration Error (MCE), also compare ER 2 to other alternative fusion strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fece83b9154b0b82875f17https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2026.103445
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluation metrics and statistical tests for machine learning2024 · 1,218 citations
  2. 2A machine learning approach to radiogenomics of breast cancer: a study of 922 subjects and 529 DCE-MRI features2018 · 314 citations
  3. 3A Survey of Convolutional Neural Networks: Analysis, Applications, and Prospects2021 · 5,128 citations
  4. 4A review of uncertainty estimation and its application in medical imaging2023 · 156 citations
  5. 5Improving the repeatability of deep learning models with Monte Carlo dropout2022 · 105 citations