Introduction Although virtual reality (VR) is increasingly deployed as a tool for education, little is known about how learning modality influences cognitive processing or whether wearable neuroimaging technologies can accurately classify cognitive load in this context. Methods In this study, 21 first-year medical students were randomly assigned to learn cardiac anatomy using either traditional 2D materials ( n = 10) or immersive 3D VR ( n = 11). Prefrontal hemodynamic activity was continuously monitored using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), while cognitive load was assessed across three learning periods using the Klepsch questionnaire. Learning outcomes were evaluated through pre- and post-learning assessments. Results Results demonstrated that both groups had comparable knowledge gains and reported similar levels of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. In contrast, fNIRS revealed modality-related differences in neural dynamics: learners using 2D materials showed significantly longer time-to-peak oxygenation across multiple channels, with large effect sizes (Cohen’s d = 1.18–1.66). Deep learning classifiers successfully distinguished high from low cognitive load using fNIRS features under leave-one-subject-out validation, with extraneous load achieving the strongest performance (91% F1-score and 92% accuracy), followed by intrinsic cognitive load (63% F1-score and 73% accuracy) and total cognitive load (60% F1-score and 78% accuracy). Discussion Together, these findings highlight the value of combining neurophysiological and subjective measures and demonstrate the feasibility of fNIRS-based cognitive load classification, offering a foundation for future adaptive and learner-responsive instructional systems in medical education.
Johannessen et al. (Tue,) studied this question.