Elevated admission troponin I conferred an 86% higher mortality risk (HR 1.86, P<0.001) and increased odds of ICU admission (OR 2.28, P<0.001) among hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
Cohort (n=37,703)
Do elevated admission levels of troponin I, D-dimer, and creatinine predict mortality and ICU admission in hospitalized COVID-19 patients?
Elevated admission troponin I, D-dimer, and creatinine are significant predictors of mortality and ICU admission in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, aiding in risk stratification.
Effect estimate: HR 1.86
p-value: p=<0.001
COVID-19’s systemic effects, including cardiac injury, necessitate prognostic biomarkers for risk stratification. This study evaluated the utility of troponin I, D-dimer, and creatinine for predicting mortality and ICU admission among hospitalized patients. In a retrospective cohort of 37,703 Iranian COVID-19 patients (2020–2022), biomarkers were assessed at admission. Cox and logistic regression analyses, along with AUC evaluations, were used to examine associations with outcomes, adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and renal function. Elevated troponin I conferred an 86% higher mortality risk (HR: 1.86, P < 0.001) and a nearly threefold increase in the odds of ICU admission (OR: 2.28, P < 0.001), with superior predictive accuracy (AUC for mortality: 72.6%; for ICU admission: 66.0%). D-dimer and creatinine were moderately associated with mortality and ICU admission. Elevated admission troponin I, D-dimer, and creatinine predicted COVID-19 mortality and ICU admission, reflecting myocardial injury, hypercoagulability, and renal dysfunction. Integrating these biomarkers improved risk stratification and guided acute care management.
farahani et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in COVID-19 (n=37,703). Elevated troponin I, D-dimer, and creatinine was evaluated on Mortality (HR 1.86, p=<0.001). Elevated admission troponin I conferred an 86% higher mortality risk (HR 1.86, P<0.001) and increased odds of ICU admission (OR 2.28, P<0.001) among hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: