Motion cues play a vital role in multi-frame infrared small target detection (MISTD). However, most targets in existing datasets exhibit regular and slow motion, which cannot reflect the complex and diverse motion patterns in real-world scenarios. This biased data distribution makes recent data-driven methods highly rely on simplified motion assumptions that tend to fail in irregular or fast motion, resulting in noisy feature representations cluttered with target-irrelevant factors. Hence, we stress that methods for MISTD should also work when targets are in complex motion. To enable this research, we propose a large-scale dataset called MIST for airborne infrared detection scenarios. The dataset is built on a synthetic data engine that models variations in pose, size, and intensity of moving targets while seamlessly blending them into real backgrounds for physical, geometric, and visual realism. Targets in MIST exhibit low signal-to-clutter ratios and complex motion, making it a promising yet challenging benchmark for developing algorithms focused on motion analysis. To tackle the challenges of MIST, we develop MISTNet, a robust baseline based on the Information Bottleneck theory. To handle irregular and fast motion, we propose a shifted neighborhood compensation block to efficiently model multi-scale correspondences for implicit motion compensation. To distill compact representations free from irrelevant cues, we design a progressive distillation decoder to hierarchically filter out redundancy while preserving target-relevant information. We benchmark 31 state-of-the-art methods and find that their performance on MIST drops significantly compared with that on the widely used NUDT-MIRSDT dataset. Our MISTNet outperforms all other methods by a large margin, with an over 6% gain in the IoU metric, demonstrating its superiority. The dataset, code, and model weights are available at https://github.com/GR-ray/MIST.
Gao et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: