PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Smart Agricultural Technology0 citationsOpen Access

Optimizing Air-Assistance for an Electrostatic Sprayer Integrated with Intelligent Spray Control in a Greenhouse Environment

View Full Paper
MHMatthew HerkinsHZHeping ZhuHJHongyoung Jeon

Key Points

  • This research aims to optimize air-assisted electrostatic spraying systems to improve canopy penetration and coverage in greenhouse environments.
  • Evaluated air-blower speeds in a wind tunnel ranging from 10 m s -1 to 20 m s -1.
  • Tested both conventional and intelligent variable-rate electrostatic spraying systems for canopy coverage and overspray.
  • Assessed spray performance based on charge-to-mass ratio and overall uniformity in full-scale greenhouse experiments.
  • Air-assisted electrostatic spraying increased canopy deposition by up to 302.7% under optimal air-blower speed conditions.
  • Intelligent systems improved average coverage by 35.5% compared to non-electrostatic conventional spraying.
  • Integration of intelligent controls showed significant enhancement in spray uniformity while reducing agrochemical waste.

Abstract

• Air-assisted electrostatic spraying increased canopy deposition by up to 302.7%. • An air-blower velocity of 10 m s -1 maximized performance in low-wind environments. • Air-assisted electrostatic spraying improved greenhouse coverage by up to 49.1%. • Variable-rate electrostatic spraying resulted in deep canopy penetration. • Intelligent systems achieved superior uniformity while reducing agrochemical waste. An air-assisted electrostatic spraying system was optimized in a wind tunnel across a range of air-blower speeds and electrostatic charging conditions, and the optimized configuration was subsequently evaluated in a full-scale greenhouse environment. Wind tunnel results showed that under still-air conditions, an air-blower speed of 10 m s -1 optimized charge-to-mass ratio (CMR) and spray performance, achieving a peak average canopy coverage of 15.4% and deposition of 1.52 µg cm -2 . Under moderate wind conditions of 2.24 m s -1 , the optimal operational parameters shifted; maximum canopy deposition was observed at an air-blower speed of 15 m s -1 , while maximum coverage occurred at 20 m s -1 . Subsequent greenhouse experiments compared conventional and variable-rate ‘intelligent’ spraying systems, both with and without electrostatic charging, to quantify canopy coverage, spray uniformity, and overspray potential. Electrostatic charging enhanced average coverage by 21.5% and 26.8% for conventional and intelligent systems, respectively, compared to the non-electrostatic counterparts. When combined with air-assistance, electrostatic charging increased coverage by 49.1% for the conventional system and 35.5% for the intelligent variable-rate system relative to the conventional non-electrostatic system. Additionally, the intelligent system significantly improved the spray uniformity index and minimized overspray potential in the tested scenarios. These findings suggest that integrating intelligent variable-rate control with air-assisted electrostatic spraying shows promise for improving canopy penetration and reducing excessive upper-canopy deposition in greenhouse environments. Further validation against biological pest control endpoints is needed to confirm the agronomic significance of these improvements.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Herkins et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fecf49b9154b0b828764c0https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2026.102190
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A portable scanning system for evaluation of spray deposit distribution2011 · 341 citations
  2. 2Embedded- Electrode Electrostatic-Induction Spray-Charging Nozzle: Theoretical and Engineering Design1978 · 135 citations
  3. 3Stereo Vision Controlled Variable Rate Sprayer for Specialty Crops: Part II. Sprayer Development and Performance Evaluation2023 · 10 citations
  4. 4Study on Electrostatic Pesticide Spraying System for Low-Concentration, High-Volume Applications2017 · 15 citations
  5. 5Electrostatic sprayers improve pesticide efficacy in greenhouses1995 · 22 citations