PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Mathematics0 citationsOpen Access

Differentially Private Probabilistic Active Disturbance Rejection Control with Uncertainty-Calibrated Extended State Observers

View Full Paper
JDJiahui DaiPHPeng Hou

Key Points

  • The research aims to enhance active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) while addressing privacy and noise amplification challenges.
  • Proposed a Differentially Private Probabilistic ADRC (DP-PADRC) framework for nonlinear single-input single-output systems under saturation.
  • Combined a linear extended state observer (ESO) with a lightweight uncertainty surrogate derived from privatized innovations.
  • Derived an ISS-type mean-square bound considering disturbance derivative, measurement-noise variance, and privacy parameters.
  • Simulation results show improved tracking and noise robustness compared to fixed-gain LADRC, with specific performance metrics indicating superiority.
  • Outlined the privacy-performance trade-off, demonstrating effective control even with privacy constraints.
  • Quantified privacy-induced perturbation affecting the scheduling signal across repeated tuning windows.

Abstract

Active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) is attractive because it estimates and compensates a lumped “total disturbance” with limited plant information, but privacy-sensitive networked deployment, measurement-noise amplification, and actuator saturation remain insufficiently addressed together. This paper proposes a Differentially Private Probabilistic ADRC (DP-PADRC) framework for nonlinear SISO systems under saturation. In contrast to adaptive ADRC schemes that schedule gains from raw residuals, and unlike model-based differentially private filters that rely on explicit stochastic plant models, the proposed method combines a linear ESO with a lightweight uncertainty surrogate computed from clipped and privatized innovations. The resulting controller is not Bayesian; rather, it is probabilistic in the sense that second-moment information from the released innovation stream is explicitly used to calibrate observer bandwidth and disturbance compensation. We further incorporate a saturation-aware gate so that scheduling remains well behaved when the commanded and applied inputs differ. An ISS-type mean-square bound is derived for the closed loop, making the dependence on the disturbance derivative, measurement-noise variance, clipping level, and privacy parameters (ε,δ) explicit. We also discuss the composition of privacy loss across repeated tuning windows and quantify the privacy-induced perturbation of the scheduling signal. Simulation-based nonlinear servo benchmarks show improved tracking/noise robustness over fixed-gain LADRC and a nonlinear ADRC baseline, while clarifying the privacy–performance trade-off and the scope of the method.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dai et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fecf71b9154b0b828766c4https://doi.org/10.3390/math14091564
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Disturbance Rejection for Systems with Uncertainties Based on Fixed-Time Equivalent-Input-Disturbance Approach2024 · 74 citations
  2. 2Distributed output-feedback leader-following consensus of nonlinear multiagent systems2025 · 40 citations
  3. 3Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity in Private Data Analysis2006 · 7,218 citations
  4. 4Robust IDA-PBC for non-separable PCH systems under time-varying external disturbances2024 · 18 citations
  5. 5Scaling and bandwidth-parameterization based controller tuning2005 · 2,429 citations