PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Transboundary and Emerging Diseases0 citationsOpen Access

Resilience of Belgian Cattle Farmers Towards Infectious Diseases Outbreaks

View Full Paper
VRVéronique RenaultLDLaurent DeloozMHMarie‐France Humblet

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the resilience of Belgian cattle farmers in implementing biosecurity measures during infectious disease outbreaks.
  • Developed a composite resilience index integrating implementation, feasibility, and effectiveness of biosecurity measures.
  • Conducted a farm-level survey of 100 cattle farms documenting 41 biosecurity measures.
  • Engaged 38 farmers in feasibility assessments and evaluated expert effectiveness on disease-specific measures.
  • Farm-level resilience scores ranged from 17% to 99%, indicating significant variability.
  • Dairy farms showed higher resilience scores than beef farms, with no provincial differences observed.
  • Low uptake of effective and feasible measures suggests behavioral and perceptual barriers exist.

Abstract

The study addresses the growing risk of infectious disease outbreaks in livestock by developing and applying a composite resilience index to evaluate the adaptive capacity of Belgian cattle farmers in implementing biosecurity measures (BSMs). The framework integrates three core dimensions, that is, implementation, feasibility and effectiveness, across three priority diseases representing distinct epidemiological profiles and transmission routes like brucellosis, bovine viral diarrhoea (BVD) and foot‐and‐mouth disease (FMD). The analysis combines three data sources as follows: (i) a farm‐level survey documenting the implementation of 41 BSM across 100 cattle farms, (ii) a feasibility assessment conducted with a panel of 38 farmers and (iii) expert evaluations of the disease‐specific effectiveness of each BSM. Farm‐level resilience scores were computed by weighting the degree of implementation by the feasibility and effectiveness of each BSM. Results show marked heterogeneity in resilience scores (17% to 99%) and in both the feasibility and adoption of BSM. Several measures assessed as both effective and feasible exhibited low uptake, indicating the existence of behavioural and perceptual barriers. The overall resilience index followed a normal distribution and was significantly higher in dairy farms than in beef farms, while no significant differences were observed between provinces. The study introduces a robust, evidence‐based tool for assessing and benchmarking farm‐level biosecurity resilience. It concludes that enhancing resilience depends less on the number of BSM implemented than on the strategic selection of context‐appropriate, feasible, and effective measures. The findings support a shift towards disease‐specific, tailored biosecurity strategies and highlight the need for further research into the behavioural determinants of feasibility.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Renault et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fecf94b9154b0b828767e4https://doi.org/10.1155/tbed/2415909
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Integrated management of blood-feeding arthropods in veterinary teaching facilities - Part 1: overview of haematophagous arthropods of interest in North-western Europe2020 · 7 citations
  2. 2Danish dairy farmers’ perceptions and attitudes related to calf-management in situations of high versus no calf mortality2009 · 60 citations
  3. 3“It's ‘common-sense’ farming”: Exploring farmers' decision-making and behaviours towards adopting circular agricultural practices2025 · 14 citations
  4. 4Bovine viral Diarrhoea virus infections and its control. A review2003 · 105 citations
  5. 5The economics of foot and mouth disease2002 · 200 citations