Objectives/Goals: Adolescent suicide is a major and growing public health concern, as suicide-related hospital visits continue to rise. Additionally, brain regions implicated in suicide risk are still undergoing change during adolescence. Here, we explore the longitudinal impact of suicide risk factors on brain functional connectivity during adolescence. Methods/Study Population: Data from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study were used for this analysis. The ABCD Study is an ongoing, multi-site, longitudinal study that follows kids starting at 9 years old until they’re 18 years old. The study sample is meant to be representative of the current US population, based on various demographic criteria obtained from the US census. For this study, baseline and Year 2 functional MRI imaging data and parent and youth reports of depression, non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), and suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STB) from the ABCD Study, were used for this analysis. Clinical and imaging data were added into a statistical model (linear mixed-effects model) to describe how the relationship between suicide risk and brain development changes over time. Results/Anticipated Results: A total of 9653 subjects (51% Female), between the ages of 8.9 – 13.8 years, across two timepoints: Baseline (N=6493) and Year 2 (N=3,160), were included in the analysis. Of this sample, 861 (8.9%) endorsed depression, 1428 (14.8%) NSSI, 2146 (22.2%) STB, and 3012 (31.2%) any of the three suicide risk factors at any timepoint. Results showed a significant interaction between the association of network connectivity and STB group status with age in the approach (B = -15.0, 95%CI -26.4, -3.8), avoidance (B = -8.5, 95%CI -16.3, -0.9), regulation (B = -14.4, 95%CI -26.2, -3.1), approach-avoidance (B = -14.4, 95%CI -28.3, -0.5), and approach-regulation (B = -15.6, 95%CI -28.8, -2.7) network. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Findings suggest, in early adolescence, presence of STBs is associated with changes in communication in regions involved in reward-(approach), emotion/threat-processing (avoidance), and their cognitive regulation (regulation). The causal relationship is unclear, but it’s an important step to understanding the neural mechanisms of suicide.
Padilla et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: