PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Journal of Animal Science0 citations

Using Multi-sensor Phenotypes to Support Management and Genetic Selection in Extensive Rangeland Systems

View Full Paper
AHAndrew S. Hess

Key Points

  • The aim is to utilize multi-sensor phenotypes to improve management and genetic selection in extensive rangeland systems.
  • Collected GPS-based data from Merino ewes on movement and land use in varied environments.
  • Employed hidden Markov models to analyze animal behavior states.
  • Used intravaginal temperature loggers to assess thermal performance during heat challenges.
  • GPS data provided insights into daily animal movement and resource utilization patterns.
  • Temperature measures indicated variability in heat stress response among individuals.
  • Wool cortisol levels served as a long-term stress indicator, reflecting overall animal well-being.

Abstract

Abstract Extensive rangeland livestock systems are central to global meat and fiber production, but they also present major challenges for phenotyping because animals are managed across large, heterogeneous landscapes with limited infrastructure, variable forage resources, and substantial environmental stress. These systems are precisely where resilience, efficiency, and adaptive capacity matter most, yet they are also where such traits have historically been the hardest to measure. Recent advances in precision livestock technologies create new opportunities to address this gap by generating repeated, biologically meaningful measurements under real-world production conditions. This presentation will highlight how multiple sensor-derived and biological data streams can be used to develop practical phenotypes for both management and genetic improvement in extensive sheep systems. First, I will discuss GPS-based movement and land-use traits collected from Merino ewes across repeated deployments in irrigated valley pasture and summer rangeland environments. These data can be translated into daily traits such as distance traveled, area use, terrain use, and resource-use behavior, while integration with environmental layers such as vegetation indices, elevation, slope, water, and shade provides a richer view of how animals interact with the landscape. I will also describe the use of hidden Markov models to distinguish active and resting states, allowing movement traits to be partitioned into more biologically interpretable behavioral contexts. Second, I will present work using intravaginal temperature loggers to capture internal temperature dynamics during heat challenge conditions. These measures provide insight into acute heat load, thermal strain, and recovery, and help reveal differences among animals in how they cope with environmental stress. Third, I will discuss wool cortisol as a longer-term, non-invasive indicator of chronic stress, providing a complementary measure of cumulative allostatic load across production stages. Across these examples, the central theme is that multi-sensor phenotypes can be converted into repeatable, interpretable indicators of resilience and efficiency in extensive systems. These phenotypes have immediate value for improving management decisions, but they also create a pathway toward novel selection criteria for traits that are difficult to assess using conventional approaches. By linking behavior, physiology, and chronic stress to performance in challenging environments, multi-sensor phenotyping can support the development of more robust, adaptable, and sustainable livestock populations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Andrew S. Hess (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fecfe9b9154b0b82876e12https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag107.025
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Use of Biometric Tags and Remote Sensing to Monitor Grazing Behavior, Forage Production, and Pasture Utilization in Extensive Landscapes2026
  2. 2393 The role of on-animal sensors in understanding feed intake, behavior, and performance of grazing livestock2024
  3. 3Editorial: Advances in precision livestock management for grazing ruminant systems2026
  4. 4216 Using GPS collars and vaginal temperature sensors for characterizing rangeland usage and climatic stress in sheep2024
  5. 5Precision Livestock Farming Technologies for Sheep Welfare in Extensive Systems: A Comprehensive Review2026